UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment

(Amendment No.  )

Filed by the Registrantþx
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto¨

Check the appropriate box:

o
¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement
o
¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)14a-6(e)(2))
þ
x Definitive Proxy Statement
o
¨ Definitive Additional Materials
o
¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
Gray Television, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ

Gray Television, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x No fee required.
o
¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 
 

 (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 
 

 (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 
 

 (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 
 

 (5) Total fee paid:
  
  

o
¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 (1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 
 

 (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 
 

 (3) 

Filing Party:

 
 

 (4) 

Date Filed:

 
 


GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

4370 Peachtree Road, N.E.

Atlanta, Georgia 30319

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Meeting to be held on June 1, 2011

May 30, 2012

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Gray Television, Inc. will be held at 9:30 a.m., local time, on Wednesday, June 1, 2011,May 30, 2012, at The Peachtree Insurance Center, The Executive Board Room, 5th Floor, 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319, for the purpose of considering and acting upon:

 1.The election of eleventen members of Gray Television, Inc.’s Board of Directors;

 2.ApprovalThe approval of a non-binding advisory resolution relatingamendments to the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (the “Say-on-Pay Resolution”);Gray Television, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan;

 3.A non-binding advisory vote relating to the frequency (every one, two or three years)The ratification of Gray Television, Inc.’s non-binding shareholder Say-on-Pay Resolution;
4.Ratifying the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as Gray Television, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2011;2012; and

 5.4.Such other business and matters or proposals as may properly come before the meeting.

Only holders of record of Gray Television, Inc. common stock, no par value per share, and Gray Television, Inc. Class A common stock, no par value per share, at the close of business on March 25, 201122, 2012 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. Attendance at the annual meeting is limited to such shareholders of record at the close of business on March 25, 201122, 2012 and to any invitees of Gray Television, Inc.

Your vote is very important. If you are unable to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote as soon as possible by one of three convenient methods: by calling the toll-free number listed on the proxy card, by accessing the Internet site listed on the proxy card or by signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

Atlanta, Georgia

April 19, 2011

2012


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT
VOTING REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROPOSAL 2 — APPROVAL OF A NON-BINDING ADVISORY RESOLUTION RELATING TO COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
PROPOSAL 3 — ADVISORY VOTE RELATING TO THE FREQUENCY (EVERY ONE, TWO OR THREE YEARS) OF THE COMPANY’S FUTURE SHAREHOLDER NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
PROPOSAL 4 — RATIFICATION OF COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2011
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEMBERSHIP
BENEFICIAL SHARE OWNERSHIP
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
OTHER MATTERS
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION IN NEXT YEAR’S PROXY STATEMENT
OTHER SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR PRESENTATION AT NEXT YEAR’S ANNUAL MEETING
AVAILABILITY OF FORM 10-K
HOUSEHOLDING


GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

4370 Peachtree Road, N.E.

Atlanta, Georgia 30319

PROXY STATEMENT

For Annual Meeting of Shareholders

to be Held on June 1, 2011

May 30, 2012

This proxy statement is being furnished by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Gray Television, Inc., a Georgia corporation (which we refer to as “Gray,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), to the holders of our common stock, no par value per share, and our Class A common stock, no par value per share, in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board for use at the 20112012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2011“2012 Annual Meeting”) to be held at The Peachtree Insurance Center, The Executive Board Room, 5th Floor, 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319, on Wednesday, June 1, 2011,May 30, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., local time, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. For directions to the location where the 20112012 Annual Meeting will be held, you may contact our corporate offices at (404) 266-8333. Distribution of this proxy statement and a proxy card to shareholders is scheduled to begin on or about April 19, 2011.

2012.

A proxy delivered pursuant to this solicitation is revocable at the option of the person giving the same at any time before it is exercised. A proxy may be revoked, prior to its exercise, by signing and delivering a later dated proxy card, by submitting a later dated vote by Internet or by telephone, by delivering written notice of the revocation of the proxy to our SecretaryVice President Law and Development prior to the 20112012 Annual Meeting, or by attending and voting at the 20112012 Annual Meeting. Attendance at the 20112012 Annual Meeting, in and of itself, will not constitute revocation of a proxy. Unless previously revoked, the shares represented by the enclosed proxy will be voted in accordance with the shareholder’s directions if the proxy is duly submitted prior to the 20112012 Annual Meeting.

If you return a signed proxy card that does not indicate your voting preferences, the persons named as proxies on the proxy card will vote your sharesFORthe election of each of the director nominees recommended by the Board, FOR the Say-on-Pay Resolution,amendments to the Gray Television, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan and FOR the ratification of the Company’s independent registered public accountant, and forEVERY THREE YEARSon the proposal relating to the frequency of Say-on Pay Resolution and in accordance with the discretion of the named proxies on other matters properly brought before the 20112012 Annual Meeting.

The expenses associated with this proxy statement and soliciting the proxies sought hereby will be borne by us. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited by our officers, directors and regular employees, who will not receive additional compensation therefore,therefor, in person or by telephone or other means of communication. We also will request brokerage firms, banks, nominees, custodians and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners of shares of the common stock and the Class A common stock as of the record date for the 20112012 Annual Meeting and will provide reimbursement for the cost of forwarding the proxy materials in accordance with customary practice. Your cooperation in promptly submitting your vote will help to avoid additional expense.

3


VOTING REQUIREMENTS

Record Date and Voting Rights

Our Board has fixed the close of business on March 25, 201122, 2012 as the record date for determining holders of the common stock and the Class A common stock entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 20112012 Annual Meeting. Only holders of record of our common stock and/or our Class A common stock on that date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the 20112012 Annual Meeting. Shareholders of record may vote by:

Attending the 2012 Annual Meeting and voting in person;

Voting by either:Internet at http://www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card;

attending the 2011 Annual Meeting and voting in person;
voting by Internet athttp://www.proxyvote.com;
voting by telephone at 1-800-690-6903 as directed on the enclosed proxy card; or
completing and mailing the proxy card.

Voting by telephone at 1-800-690-6903 as directed on the enclosed proxy card; or

Completing and mailing the proxy card.

Instructions for voting are included on the proxy card.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 20112012 Annual Meeting

The following information can be found athttp://www.proxyvote.com:

Notice of Annual Meeting;

Notice of Annual Meeting;
Proxy Statement;
2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K; and
Form of Proxy Card.

Proxy Statement;

2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K; and

Form of Proxy Card.

As of the record date, March 25, 2011, 51,392,98422, 2012, 51,405,846 shares of our common stock and 5,753,020 shares of our Class A common stock were outstanding. Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote and each share of our Class A common stock is entitled to ten votes. The total number of possible votes for each director nominee, and for each other matter to be acted upon, is 108,923,184.

108,936,046.

A quorum of Gray’s shareholders is necessary to hold a valid 2012 Annual Meeting. A number of votes equal to or greater than a majority of possible votes, or 54,461,59354,468,024 votes (including abstentions and broker non-votes), represented in person or by proxy will constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes (which occur with respect to an item when a broker submits a proxy but is not permitted to or otherwise declines to vote on that item without instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and no such instruction is given) will be counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the 20112012 Annual Meeting will be tabulated by the inspector of elections appointed for the meeting, who also will determine whether a quorum is present for the transaction of business.

Required Vote

With respect to Proposal 1 regarding the election of the director nominees, a majority of the votes is not required; instead, the director nominees will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the 2012 Annual Meeting, which means that the eleventen nominees receiving the most votes will be elected. Under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, if your broker holds your shares in its name, your broker is not permitted to vote your shares with respect to the election of directors if your broker does not receive voting instructions from you. Votes withheld from any nominee will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as “votes cast” and, therefore,

4


will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

4


With respect to Proposal 2, the approval of amendments to our 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan to provide that nonemployee directors of Gray shall be eligible to participate in such plan and add a “no repricing” provision to the plan, as well as for shareholders to reapprove the material terms for performance-based awards under the plan, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast in person or by proxy at the 2012 Annual Meeting. Under NYSE rules, however, the total votes cast must represent over 50% in interest of all securities entitled to vote on this proposal. Because abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast on this proposal, they will have the practical effect of a vote against this proposal unless more than 50% of our outstanding shares are voted with respect to this proposal.

With respect to Proposal 3, ratification of the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as Gray’s non-binding Say-on-Pay Resolutionindependent registered public accounting firm for 2012 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the 20112012 Annual Meeting. Because the shareholder vote on this proposal is advisory only, it will not be binding on Gray or the Board. However, the Management Personnel Committee will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation as the Committee deems appropriate. Under the NYSE rules, if your broker holds your shares in its name, your broker is not permitted to vote your shares with respect to the Say-on-Pay Resolution if your broker does not receive voting instructions from you. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as “votes cast” and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

     With respect to Proposal 3, the non-binding advisory vote relating to the frequency of the Say-on-Pay vote will require shareholders to choose between a frequency of every one, two or three years or abstain from voting. Because the shareholder vote on this proposal is advisory only, it will not be binding on Gray or the Board. However, the Board will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding the frequency of the advisory Say-on-Pay vote as it deems appropriate. Under the NYSE rules, if your broker holds your shares in its name, your broker is not permitted to vote your shares with respect to the frequency of the Say-on-Pay vote if your broker does not receive voting instructions from you. The option receiving a plurality of votes cast will be considered the preference of the shareholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as “votes cast” and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
     With respect to Proposal 4, ratification of the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2011 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the 2011 Annual Meeting. Under the NYSE rules, if your broker holds your shares in its name, your broker is permitted to vote your shares with respect to the ratification of the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm for 20112012 even if your broker does not receive voting instructions from you. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as “votes cast” and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.

With respect to any other matter that may properly come before the 20112012 Annual Meeting for shareholder consideration, a matter generally will be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the 20112012 Annual Meeting unless the question is one upon which a different vote is required by express provision of the laws of Georgia, federal law, Gray’s Articles of Incorporation or Gray’s Bylaws, or, to the extent permitted by the laws of Georgia, the Board has expressly provided that some other vote shall be required, in which case such express provisions shall govern.

5


PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees

At the 20112012 Annual Meeting, eleventen directors are to be elected to hold office until our next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The Board has been reduced to ten members due to the retirement of Zell B. Miller on December 7, 2011. Each nominee is currently serving as a director.director, with the exception of Robin R. Howell, whose nomination to the Board was recommended by the Management Personnel Committee. In case any nominee listed in the table below should be unavailable for any reason, which our management has no reason to anticipate, your proxy will be voted for any substitute nominee or nominees who may be selected by the Management Personnel Committee prior to or at the 20112012 Annual Meeting. In such circumstances, if no substitute is selected by the Management Personnel Committee prior to or at the 20112012 Annual Meeting, the Board may determine to reduce the membership of the Board to the number of nominees available for election.

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of those director nominees specified in this proxy statement.

Set forth below is information concerning each of the nominees as of April 19, 2011.

           
  Director    
Name Since Age Position
           
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.  1993   49  Director, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
William E. Mayher, III  1990   72  Chairman of the Board of Directors
Robert S. Prather, Jr.  1993   66  Director, President and Chief Operating Officer
J. Mack Robinson  1993   87  Director and Chairman Emeritus
Richard L. Boger  1991   64  Director
Ray M. Deaver  2002   70  Director
T. L. Elder  2003   72  Director
Zell B. Miller  2005   79  Director
Howell W. Newton  1991   64  Director
Hugh E. Norton  1987   78  Director
Harriett J. Robinson  1997   80  Director
2012.

Name

  Director
Since
 Age  

Position

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

  1993 50  Director, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

William E. Mayher, III

  1990 73  Chairman of the Board of Directors

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

  1993 67  Director, President and Chief Operating Officer

Richard L. Boger

  1991 65  Director

Ray M. Deaver

  2002 71  Director

T. L. Elder

  2003 73  Director

Robin R. Howell

  (1) 47  Director Nominee

Howell W. Newton

  1991 65  Director

Hugh E. Norton

  1987 79  Director

Harriett J. Robinson

  1997 81  Director

(1)Mrs. Robin R. Howell is a nominee for initial election to the Board in 2012.

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.,has been our Chief Executive Officer since August 20, 2008 and has also served as our Vice-Chairman since September 2002. Before that, he had been our Executive Vice President since September 2000. He has served as one of our directors since 1993. He is a member of the Executive Committee of our Board. He has served as a director and Chairman of the Board of Gray Television Group, Inc. and WVLT-TV, Inc. which are our subsidiaries, and as President, Chairman of the Board and a director of Gray Television Licensee, LLC, another of our subsidiaries, since 2008. He has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Atlantic American Corporation, an insurance holding company, since 1995, and as Chairman of that company since February 24, 2009. He has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, life and casualty insurance companies, respectively, since 1991. He has served as Vice Chairman of Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance Company since 1992 and Vice Chairman of Georgia Casualty & Surety Company from 1992 through 2008. He served as Chairman of the Board of Triple Crown Media, Inc. (“TCM”) from December 2005 until December 2009. Mr. Howell also serves as a director of

6


Atlantic American Corporation and its subsidiaries American Southern Insurance Company, American Safety Insurance Company and Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance Company, as well as Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. He is the son-in-law of Mr. J. Mack Robinson and Mrs. Harriett J. Robinson, both current members of our Board.Board, and he is the husband of Mrs. Howell. In addition to his current role

6


as Gray’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Howell brings to the Board experience from past leadership positions as an executive and his service on numerous boards. Mr. Howell also servedhas practiced as an attorney in a former General Counsel,variety of roles, and his experience in that discipline adds a legal perspective to the decisions facing the Board.

William E. Mayher, IIIis a member and Chairman of the Executive Committee, the Audit Committee, the Management Personnel Committee and the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee of Gray’s Board, and has served as Chairman of Gray’s Board since August 1993. Dr. Mayher was a neurosurgeon in Albany, Georgia from 1970 to 1998. Dr. Mayher is thea former Chairman of the Medical College of Georgia Foundation Board and served as Chairman of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia and as a member of the Board of Directors of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. He also serves as Chairman of the Albany Regional Airport Commission. He is currently serving as Senior Warden of St. Paul’s Episcopal Church. Dr. Mayher is a member of the Georgia Aviation Hall of Fame Board, and he is also a Senior FAA Aviation Medical Examiner. Dr. Mayher has been an active member of our Board for over 20 years, and his tenure provides stability and a familiarity with our operations. As evidence of the breadth of his knowledge, he currently serves on all of the Board’s committees as a source of continued and reliable leadership.

Robert S. Prather, Jr.,has served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since September 2002. He has served as one of our directors since 1993. He is a member of the Executive Committee of our Board. He has served as President and a director of our subsidiaries Gray Television Group, Inc. and WVLT-TV, Inc., since 2002. He has been a director of TCMSouthern Community Newspapers (formerly known as Triple Crown Media, Inc.) (“SCN”) since 1994, and served as Chairman of TCMSCN from December 2005 until November 2007. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of TCMSCN from May 2005 to December 30, 2005, and has served in that position since November 2007. TCMSCN filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. bankruptcy code on September 14, 2009. The order confirming the Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of theSCN emerged from bankruptcy code became effective December 8, 2009. He serves as an advisory director of Swiss Army Brands, Inc., and serves on the Board of Trustees of the Georgia World Congress Center Authority. He also serves as a member of the Board of Directors for GAMCO Investors, Inc., Gaylord Entertainment Company and Victory Ventures,Draper Holdings Business Trust. He served as an advisory director of Swiss Army Brands, Inc. until 2011. He served on the Board of Trustees of the Georgia World Congress Center Authority until 2010, serving as its Chairman for three years ended December 31, 2010. Mr. Prather’s background as both our current Chief Operating Officer and having served as a former Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer lends a unique perspective to the Board. He possesses a wealth of knowledge about our industry and his tenure on the Board provides consistent leadership.

J. Mack Robinsonwas Gray’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from September 2002 until August 2008. Prior to that, he was Gray’s President and Chief Executive Officer from 1996 through September 2002. He is Chairman Emeritus of Gray’s Board. Mr. Robinson has served as Chairman Emeritus of TCM since December 2005, Chairman of the Board and President of Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire and Casualty Insurance Company since 1958, Chairman of the Board of Atlantic American Corporation, an insurance holding company, since 1974, and was previously a director of Bull Run Corporation, a predecessor to TCM. Mr. Robinson also serves as a director of the following companies: Bankers Fidelity Life Insurance Company, American Southern Insurance Company and American Safety Insurance Company. Mr. Robinson is the husband of Mrs. Harriett J. Robinson and the father-in-law of Mr. Hilton H. Howell, Jr., both members of Gray’s Board. Mr. Robinson’s experience as Gray’s former Chief Executive Officer brings to the Board a familiarity with the challenges facing a large public company. His civic involvement and philanthropic activities provide a critical link to the business community.

7


Richard L. Bogeris a member of the Audit Committee of Gray’s Board. Mr. Boger has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Lex-Tek International, Inc., an insurance softwarea financial services consulting company, since February 2002. He has also served since July 2003, as business manager for Owen Holdings, LLLP, a Georgia Limited Liability Limited Partnership; since July 2004, as General Partner of Shawnee Meadow Holdings, LLLP, a Georgia Limited Liability Limited Partnership; and since March 2006, as business manager for Heathland Holdings, LLLP, a Georgia Limited Liability Limited Partnership, , each of which is an investment holding company. He also serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of Corner Cap Group of Funds, a series mutual fund. Mr. Boger brings to the Board extensive managerial and entrepreneurial experience from his current position as the Chief Executive Officer of a specialized financial services softwareconsulting company, his having founded and sold two commercial insurance services companies, and his present service as a partner and business manager in three investment companies. His perspective from serving in several industries outside our own, including on

7


the boards of a mutual fund and several nonprofit organizations, provides the Board with an informed resource for a wide range of disciplines and adds a diverse voice to its deliberations.

Ray M. Deaveris Chairman of the Management Personnel Committee and a member of the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee of Gray’s Board. Prior to his appointment to Gray’s Board, Mr. Deaver served as Gray’s Regional Vice President-Texas from October 1999 until his retirement in 2001. He was the President and General Manager of KWTX Broadcasting Company and President of Brazos Broadcasting Company from November 1997 until their acquisition by Gray in October 1999. Mr. Deaver’s years of experience in the broadcasting field and his role as the former General Manager for two of our affiliates providesprovide the Board with a wealth of industry-specific operational knowledge. In that capacity and as our former Regional Vice President in Texas, Mr. Deaver’s diverse background lends a unique, localized perspective to the Board.

T.L. (Gene) Elderis a member of the Audit Committee of Gray’s Board. SinceHe is a CPA and has over 40 years of experience as in the Accounting and Finance fields, with over 25 years as a Chief Financial Officer. In 1994, Mr. Elder has beenbecame a partner of Tatum, LLC, a national firm of career chief financial officers which was acquired by Spherion Staffing Services in March 2010, and served as a Senior Partner of that firm from 2004 until his retirement from that position in May 2009. Mr. Elder, through his background as a former Chief Financial Officer, provides the Board and the Audit Committee with significant financial expertise. His leadership position and experience with Tatum, LLC providesaccounting expertise.

Robin R. Howell has served as Vice President and Director of both Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire & Casualty Company since 1992. She is a former Chairman of the Board with an informed resource for accounting issues facing the Company.

Zell B. MillerisFarmer’s and Merchant’s Bank and a member of the Management Personnel Committee and the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee of Gray’s Board. He was U.S. Senator from Georgia from July 2000 until his retirement in 2005. Prior to that time he was Governor of the State of Georgia from 1991 until 1999 and Lieutenant Governor from 1975 until 1991. He is a Director Emeritus of the Board of Directors for Premier Bancshares. She received a BA in Economics from the University of United Community BanksVirginia and a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Texas at Austin, and has had a number of management and oversight roles in Blairsville, Georgia. Gov. Miller’s proven leadershipvarious businesses in which her family has maintained ownership interests since that time. Mrs. Howell is the daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Robinson and the wife of Mr. Howell. Mrs. Howell is active in the community, serving on the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of the High Museum of Art, the Board of Directors of the Forward Arts Foundation, and as a member of the Junior League of Atlanta. Mrs. Howell’s involvement at the executive experience stems from his years of public service during which he developed expertiseand board level in addressing the challenges facing large, complex organizations. His substantialvarious businesses and numerous civic, social and academic associations provides valuable insight into political and economic affairs provides a diverse perspective to the BoardCompany and a working knowledge of government operations.
elevates the Company’s profile in the community.

Howell W. Newtonis Chairman of the Audit Committee of Gray’s Board. Since 1978, Mr. Newton has been President and Treasurer of Trio Manufacturing Co., a real estate and investment company. Mr. Newton’s many years of executive service with a financial services company provides the Board with considerable financial expertise. His tenure on our Board provides consistent leadership, and his familiarity with Gray’s operations serves as an ongoing resource for issues facing a large, public company.

8


Hugh E. Nortonis Chairman of the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee and is a member of the Management Personnel Committee of Gray’s Board. Mr. Norton has been President of Norco Holdings, Inc., an insurance agency, since 1973 and also is a real estate developer in Destin, Florida. Prior to that, he was Regional Manager of Security Insurance Group where he served for 15 years. Mr. Norton brings to the Board a wealth of business experience based on his many years of service as an executive, as well as a unique perspective based on the regulatory and local government issues he faces as a developer. As the director with the longest tenure on our Board, he also serves as an ongoing source for industry-specific knowledge.

8


Harriett J. Robinsonhas been a director of Atlantic American Corporation since 1989. Mrs. Robinson has also been a director of Delta Life Insurance Company and Delta Fire and Casualty Insurance Company since 1967. Mrs. Robinson is the wife of Mr. J. Mack Robinson and the mother-in-law of Mr. Hilton H. Howell, Jr., both current members of Gray’s Board.Board, and the mother of Mrs. Howell. Mrs. Robinson’s active service on our Board and on the boards of several other companies for a number of years provides capable leadership and a familiarity with the operational issues facing organizations in today’s business climate. She lends a diverse voice to the Board’s deliberations, and her civic involvement and philanthropic activities provide a critical link to the community, particularly to women in business.

9


PROPOSAL 2

APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

2007 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

We are asking our shareholders to approve amendment No. 1 (“Amendment No. 1”) to the Gray Television, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2007 Incentive Plan”) and, as part of that approval, to reapprove the material terms for performance-based awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan. The version of the 2007 Incentive Plan that was in effect prior to Amendment No. 1 was adopted by our board of directors on March 14, 2007 and approved by our shareholders on May 2, 2007.

On April 2, 2012, the board of directors approved Amendment No. 1, which generally makes the following changes to such plan: (1) provides that nonemployee directors of Gray and every subsidiary of Gray shall be eligible to participate in the 2007 Incentive Plan as participants and (2) adds a “no repricing” provision.

If the shareholders approve the Amendment No. 1, the 2007 Incentive Plan will allow awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan to be granted to nonemployee directors of Gray and every subsidiary of Gray and will prohibit repricing of stock options and stock appreciation rights.

Approval of Amendment No. 1 will also constitute reapproval by our shareholders of the material terms for performance-based awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan, which is necessary to provide the flexibility for us to make certain awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan that will be tax-deductible by us as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

Section 162(m) of the Code limits the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of compensation in excess of $1 million per year for the chief executive officer and certain other officers, unless such compensation qualifies as performance-based compensation under the Code. Various requirements must be satisfied in order for awards to qualify as performance-based compensation. One requirement is that the material terms relating to such awards must be approved by the shareholders of the public company every five years.

By reapproving the material terms for performance-based awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan, certain awards that could be made under the 2007 Incentive Plan would qualify as performance-based compensation, assuming other conditions are met.

Description of the 2007 Incentive Plan

A NON-BINDING ADVISORY RESOLUTION RELATING TO
COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

summary of the material terms of the 2007 Incentive Plan, as it is proposed to be amended, appears below. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2007 Incentive Plan, as proposed to be amended, which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement.

Purpose. The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform2007 Incentive Plan is designed to encourage certain employees (including officers and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) requires thatdirectors who are also employees) and nonemployee directors of Gray or Gray’s shareholders havesubsidiaries to acquire Gray common stock or Class A common stock or to receive monetary payments based on the opportunityvalue of such stock or upon achieving certain goals on a mutually advantageous basis, thereby strengthening the employees’ and nonemployee directors’ desire to castremain with Gray, while simultaneously providing an incentive to work for Gray’s success.

10


Administration. The 2007 Incentive Plan will be administered by a non-binding advisory vote regarding the compensationcommittee or subcommittee of Gray’s executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table contained in this proxy statementboard of directors that consists of no fewer than two members, each of whom is an outside director and a “non-employee” director (the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”“2007 Plan Committee”). The Company has disclosed the compensationdeterminations of the NEOs2007 Plan Committee will be made in accordance with their judgment as to the best interest of Gray and its shareholders and in accordance with the purpose of the 2007 Incentive Plan. Determinations, interpretations or other actions made or taken by the 2007 Plan Committee pursuant to the provisions of the 2007 Incentive Plan will be final and binding and conclusive for all purposes and upon all persons whomsoever. The 2007 Plan Committee may delegate administrative duties to one or more officers or employees of Gray or subsidiaries of Gray to the extent that such delegation would not jeopardize the performance-based exception under Section 162(m) of the Code or otherwise violate applicable law or rules adopted byof the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Participants. Employees (approximately 2,100 as of March 31, 2012) and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

     The compensation policies for the NEOs are designed to attract, motivate and retain talented executive officers and to align their interests with the long-term interestsnonemployee directors (eight as of Gray’s shareholders. Before voting on this proposal, shareholders are urged to read theCompensation Discussion and Analysisand the accompanying tables and narrative contained in this proxy statement, which discusses in detail our 2010 compensation program, decisions made by the Management Personnel Committee, and includesMarch 31, 2012) of Gray or any designated subsidiary who have a review of compensation objectives, processes and rationale. Highlights of such discussion are as follows:
     In fiscal year 2010, Gray had strong performance in an improving economic environment, with 2010 results also reflecting the election yearmajor impact on the broadcast industry. Additionally,success and future growth and profitability of Gray, completedas determined by the 2007 Plan Committee in its sole discretion, are eligible to participate in the 2007 Incentive Plan. A designation as a major refinancing effort that was criticalparticipant in one year will not require the 2007 Plan Committee to designate such person to receive (1) an award in any other year, (2) the same type of award as granted to the ongoing successparticipant in any other year or as granted to any other participant in any year, or (3) the same amount of award as granted to the participant in any other year or as granted to any other participant in any year.

Shares Reserved Under the Plan. The 2007 Incentive Plan allows Gray to issue an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock with not more than 1,000,000 out of that 6,000,000 being Class A common stock. The 6,000,000 maximum includes approximately 2,469,000 shares of stock that were unused shares under the 2002 Long Term Incentive Plan. No new awards are eligible to be made under the 2002 Long Term Incentive Plan. Stock underlying awards under the 2002 Long Term Incentive Plan that expire, are cancelled or are forfeited after May 2, 2007 will not be added back to the 6,000,000 maximum. As of April 2, 2012, an aggregate of 4,461,007 shares were available for future grants under the 2007 Incentive Plan, of which 1,000,000 of such shares may be shares of Class A common stock.

The following awards will be counted against the 6,000,000 maximum: (1) stock underlying outstanding options or performance awards while such options and performance awards are outstanding, (2) the full number of stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) granted that are to be settled in common stock, regardless of the Company. Asnumber of shares actually issued upon settlement of such SAR, and (3) restricted stock issued pursuant to the 2007 Incentive Plan while such restricted stock is outstanding even while subject to restrictions. When the exercise price of an option is paid by delivery of shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock, the number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Incentive Plan shall continue to be reduced by the gross (rather than the net) number of shares issued pursuant to such exercise. Shares underlying expired, canceled or forfeited awards (except restricted stock) may be added back to the 6,000,000 maximum.

Unless and until the 2007 Plan Committee determines that an award to a covered employee shall not be designed to comply with the performance-based exception under Section 162(m) of the Code, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock that may be awarded to any individual in any one fiscal year pursuant to stock options will be 500,000 shares, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock that may be awarded to any individual in any one fiscal year pursuant to SARs will be 500,000 shares, and the maximum aggregate payout to any individual in any one year as to performance awards will be the greater of $1,000,000 or 500,000 shares. Shares related to a cancelled award or an award that is amended

11


in a way that is treated as a cancellation will count against the maximum limitations for the applicable fiscal year.

Grant of Awards.After the 2007 Plan Committee grants an award to a participant, Gray will notify the participant of such grant and will deliver or mail an award agreement to the participant. The participant must execute and return the award agreement within 30 days after it is mailed or delivered by Gray. If the participant fails to execute and return the award agreement within the 30 day period, his or her award will terminate automatically. However, if the participant dies within the 30 day period, the award agreement will be effective notwithstanding the fact that it has not been signed prior to death.

Types of Awards. The 2007 Incentive Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards, SARs and performance awards (collectively, the “awards”). Except as specifically limited in the 2007 Incentive Plan, the 2007 Plan Committee has complete discretion in determining the type and number of awards to be granted and the terms and conditions of such awards (such terms and conditions need not be uniform as between different participants). The types of awards are described in greater detail below.

Incentive Stock Options. Incentive stock options granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan, which are intended to comply with Section 422 of the Code, may be exercised as provided in the individual award agreements, but in no event later than 10 years from the date of grant. The purchase price per share of Gray common stock or Class A common stock purchasable under any incentive stock option (which may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date the option is granted) will be determined by the 2007 Plan Committee. The purchase price may be paid by check or, in the discretion of the 2007 Plan Committee, by the delivery of shares then owned by the participant. The aggregate fair market value of the stock for which an incentive stock option is exercisable for the first time during any calendar year (under all option plans of Gray and its subsidiary corporations) shall not exceed $100,000 per participant. Only key employees may be granted incentive stock options under the 2007 Incentive Plan.

Upon a termination of employment for any reason (other than death or disability), an incentive stock option will terminate not later than 3 months after such termination (or 3 months after death, if the optionee dies within 3 months after such termination).

Upon a termination of employment as a result of this refinancing transaction, Gray’s management projects thatdeath or disability, an incentive stock option will be exercisable for 12 months after such termination (or the Companylonger of the remainder of the 12-month period or 3 months after death, if the optionee dies within 12 months after a termination as a result of disability).

In no event shall any incentive stock option be exercised more than 10 years after its date of grant.

Nonqualified Stock Options. Nonqualified stock options granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan may be exercised as provided in the individual award agreements, but in no event later than 10 years from the date of grant. The purchase price per share of Gray common stock or Class A common stock purchasable under any nonqualified stock option (which may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date the option is granted) will benefitbe determined by the 2007 Plan Committee. The purchase price may be paid by check or, in the discretion of the 2007 Plan Committee, by the delivery of shares then owned by the participant. The 2007 Plan Committee will have the right to determine at the time an option is granted whether shares issued upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option will be subject to restrictions, and if so, the nature of the restrictions.

12


Unless determined otherwise in the award agreement, upon a termination of employment or service for any reason (other than death, disability or retirement), an option will terminate 3 months after such termination.

Unless determined otherwise in the award agreement, upon a termination of employment or service as a result of death, disability or retirement, an option will terminate 12 months after such termination (or 3 months after death, if the optionee dies within 12 months after termination as a result of retirement or disability).

In no event shall any option be exercised more than 10 years after its date of grant.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A SAR is the right to receive a payment from significant savingsGray equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share of Gray common stock or Class A common stock at the date of exercise over the next several years. The estimated savings reflect both reduced interest costs and reduced preferred stock dividends, netbase price (or the exercise price of an option, if the SAR is granted in conjunction with an option). At the discretion of the amortized refinancing costs.

     The Management Personnel2007 Plan Committee, which servesSARs may be granted (1) in lieu of exercise of an option or (2) independent of an option. If the option qualifies as our Compensation Committee, meets the independence standardsan incentive stock option pursuant to Section 422 of the Dodd-Frank Act and meets without management presentCode, the related SAR must comply with the applicable provisions of the Code. The base or grant price of each SAR will equal the fair market value of Gray common stock or Class A common stock on the date of grant of the SAR. Payment for SARs may be made in cash or Gray common stock or Class A common stock, or in a combination thereof, at least four times per year to discuss compensation. Performance measures relevant to the Management Personnel Committee’s compensation decisions include revenue (less agency commissions), NOP and broadcast cash flow. Please readdiscretion of the section2007 Plan Committee. In addition, at the time of this proxy statement entitledAnnual Incentive Performance Targets for 2010forgrant, the 2007 Plan Committee may, in its sole discretion, establish any other conditions on exercise of a more detailed explanation of those performance measures and the method for calculating NOP and broadcast cash flow.SAR. The following table sets forth these performance measures as recorded by Gray for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
             
  2010 2009 2008
Performance Measure ($) ($) ($)
  (in thousands)
Revenue (less agency commissions)  346,058   270,374   327,176 
NOP  136,160   68,623   113,507 
Broadcast cash flow  148,914   81,992   130,716 
     For 2010 and 2009, Gray paid cash compensation to its NEOswill apply upon the exercise of $4,273,750 and $2,055,000, respectively. The increase in cash compensation for each executive in 2010 relative to 2009 was the result almost entirely of performance-based bonuses and nonequity incentive compensation, with the exception being a base salary market adjustment for Mr. Beizer. Please read the section of this proxy statement entitledOverview of Previous Year Performance and Compensationfor the detail of these cash payments.

10

SAR:


     The Management Personnel Committee concluded that performance for 2009 did not merit any long-term incentive grants to the NEOs. The Management Personnel Committee has not awarded any long-term incentive grants to the NEOs for 2010.
Summary of Key Compensation Practices
     We seek to align our compensation programs and practices with evolving governance best practices. By way of example, our long-term incentive compensation plan expressly prohibits repricing or exchanging awards. Other examples of our efforts to align compensation policies with best practices include:
  We do not provide a supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP).
We do not provide

Exercise of SARs in Lieu of Exercise of Options. SARs exercisable in lieu of options may be exercised for tax gross-ups for executive perquisites (which are minimal, in any event).

We do not provide for tax gross-ups for change in control payments under Section 280Gall or part of the Internal Revenue Codeshares of 1986, as amended (the “IRC”).
We do not provide single-trigger golden parachute payments.
We do not provide perquisites for formerGray common stock or retired executives.
We do not provide extraordinary relocation or home buyout benefits.
We do not provide personal use of corporate aircraft, personal security systems maintenance and/or installation, car allowance, or life insurance with benefits in excessClass A common stock subject to the related option upon the exercise of the life insurance benefits offeredright to exercise an equivalent number of options. A SAR may be exercised only with respect to the majorityshares of our employees.
We do not payGray common stock or provide paymentsClass A common stock for cause terminationswhich its related option is then exercisable. Such number of shares equal to the number of SARs exercised will no longer be available for exercise under the related option (and when a share of Gray common stock or resignations other thanClass A common stock is purchased under the related option, the related SAR shall similarly no longer be available for good reason following a change in control.exercise).

     The Management Personnel Committee and Board strive to stay current on compensation best practices and trends. In addition, we made improvements over the last year to certain elements of our executive compensation programs to further align them with current market best practices, including:

  Formalized a Management Personnel Committee-driven process, with input from outside consultants

Exercise of SARs Independent of Options. SARs exercisable independent of stock options may be exercised upon whatever terms and management where appropriate;

Formalized a Management Personnel Committee-approved compensation peer group for on-going competitive market comparisons;
Ensured an appropriate benchmarking of executive roles to market data ofconditions the compensation peer group, including both proxy data and published survey data, to determine2007 Plan Committee imposes upon the value of Gray’s executive positions;
Established an executive compensation philosophy, with the target of calibrating Gray’s compensation amounts to the median of our compensation peer group (or 50th percentile);
Established a formalized annual incentive program, with market-competitive payments based on achievement of goals established at the beginning of each fiscal year; and
Applied new methodology and market data in making incentive compensation decisions made in 2010;SARs.

No bonuses

Restricted Stock. Restricted stock consists of Gray common stock or Class A common stock issued or transferred under the 2007 Incentive Plan (other than upon exercise of options or as performance awards) at any purchase price less than the fair market value thereof on the date of issuance or transfer, or as a bonus. The purchase price (if any) will be determined by the 2007 Plan Committee. Participants are entitled to all dividends paid with respect to restricted stock during the period of restriction and will not be required to return any such dividends to Gray in the event of the forfeiture of the restricted stock. Participants will be entitled to vote the restricted stock during the period of restriction. In addition, the restricted stock may be subject to (1) restrictions on the sale or other disposition thereof, (2) rights of Gray to reacquire such stock at the purchase price, if any, originally paid upon termination of employment or service within specified periods, (3) employee or nonemployee director representations that the employee or nonemployee director intends to acquire such stock for 2009 based on financial performance;

investment and not for resale and (4) other restrictions, conditions and terms as the 2007 Plan Committee deems appropriate.

11

13


Performance Awards. Performance awards consist of Gray common stock or Class A common stock, stock units or cash-based units or a combination thereof, to be issued without payment therefor, if the performance goals established by the 2007 Plan Committee are achieved during the applicable performance period. The goals established by the 2007 Plan Committee may be based upon Company-wide performance or upon operating unit performance or a combination thereof and may include return on average total capital employed, earnings per share, return on shareholders’ equity, market share, growth in Broadcast Cash Flow, growth in Broadcast Cash Flow Less Cash Corporate Expenses, growth in EBITDA, growth in total revenue and/or specified components of total revenue, reduction in or the limitation in the growth of specified operating expenses, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified operating margins, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified weighted average costs of debt, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified weighted costs of capital, operating income (loss), income (loss) from continuing operations, pretax income from continuing operations and, for a performance award that the 2007 Plan Committee determines shall not be designed to comply with the performance-based exception under Section 162(m) of the Code, such other goals as may be established by the 2007 Plan Committee. Actual payment of the performance award earned shall be in a single sum and in cash or in Gray common stock or Class A common stock or in a combination of both, as determined by the 2007 Plan Committee in its sole discretion. If Gray common stock or Class A common stock is used, the participant will not have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon until the goals are achieved and the actual shares are issued. If the performance award is paid in cash instead of Gray common stock or Class A common stock, the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2007 Incentive Plan and the number of shares which may be granted in the form of performance awards will be reduced as if shares had been issued. The 2007 Plan Committee will certify in writing that any performance goals and any other material terms of a performance award have been achieved prior to the actual payment of the performance award. All performance awards will be paid in full no later than the fifteenth day of the third month following the end of the first calendar year in which the applicable performance period ends or such awards are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

Adjustments, Amendments and Termination of the 2007 Incentive Plan. In the event of any change in corporate capitalization, certain corporate transactions, other distribution of stock or property, or any reorganization or liquidation, such adjustment shall be made in the number and class of Gray common stock or Class A common stock which may be delivered, in the number and class of and/or price of shares subject to outstanding awards granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan, and in the award limits as may be determined to be appropriate and equitable by the 2007 Plan Committee, in its sole discretion, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights, provided, however, that the number of shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock subject to any award must always be a whole number. The 2007 Plan Committee may not make any adjustments that would cause an award (1) that is exempt from Section 409A of the Code to become subject to Section 409A of the Code or (2) that is subject to Section 409A of the Code to fail to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. The awards are intended to comply with the exemptions or deferred compensation requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

The board of directors has the right to amend or terminate the 2007 Incentive Plan at any time; provided, however, that except as specifically provided in the adjustment and change in control provisions of the 2007 Incentive Plan or otherwise required by law, no amendment or termination shall reduce the amount of any existing award or change the terms and conditions of an existing award without the participant’s consent. In addition, with the exception of the adjustments described above, no amendment or other similar actions shall: (1) increase the total number of shares that may be issued under the 2007 Incentive Plan or increase the amount or type of awards that may be granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan; (2) change the minimum purchase price (if any) of shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock which may be made subject to awards under the 2007 Incentive Plan; or (3) modify the eligibility requirements, unless first duly approved by the shareholders of Gray.

14


Furthermore, except in connection with a corporate transaction or event described in the adjustment provision of the 2007 Incentive Plan, shareholder approval is required to amend the terms of outstanding awards to reduce the base price, or cancel outstanding options or SARs in exchange for cash, other awards or options or SARs with a base price that is less than the base price of the original options or SARs as applicable.

Change in Control. The 2007 Incentive Plan provides that in the event of a change of control of Gray, the 2007 Plan Committee may make such adjustments with respect to awards and take such other action as it deems advisable such as the substitution of new awards, the adjustment, termination or removal of restrictions on outstanding awards, the acceleration of awards, or the termination of outstanding awards in exchange for the cash value determined in good faith by the 2007 Plan Committee of the vested and/or unvested portion of the award. Any adjustment may provide, in the 2007 Plan Committee’s discretion, for the elimination, without payment, of any fractional shares that might otherwise become subject to an award, but may not otherwise diminish the then value of the award. The adjustment and manner of application of the foregoing will be determined by the 2007 Plan Committee in its sole discretion and to the extent permitted under Section 409A of the Code.

A “change in control” is deemed to have occurred if (1) any person (other than Gray or a permitted holder) is or becomes the beneficial owner of 45% percent or more of the combined voting power of Gray’s then outstanding securities; (2) during any period of two consecutive years individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, unless the election or nomination of such new directors is approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who were directors at the beginning of the period but excluding any individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of either an actual or threatened election contest or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a person other than the board of directors; (3) there is consummated any consolidation or merger of Gray in which Gray is not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant to which shares of Gray common stock or Class A common stock are converted into cash, securities or other property, other than a merger of Gray in which holders of Gray’s common stock or Class A common stock immediately prior to the merger have the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger; (4) there is consummated any consolidation or merger of Gray in which Gray is the continuing or surviving corporation in which the holders of Gray’s common stock or Class A common stock immediately prior to the merger do not own 51% percent or more of the combined voting power of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger; (5) there is consummated any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all, or substantially all of Gray’s assets; or (6) the shareholders of Gray approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of Gray.

Non-Transferability of Awards. No award may be transferred by the recipient, except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and each award shall be exercisable, during the participant’s lifetime, only by the participant.

Withholding.Gray has the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a participant to remit to Gray, an amount sufficient to satisfy Federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of the 2007 Incentive Plan. With respect to withholding required upon the exercise of options or SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on restricted stock, or upon any other taxable event arising as a result of awards granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan, participants may make an irrevocable election, subject to the approval of the 2007 Plan Committee, to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having Gray withhold shares having a fair market value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the minimum statutory total tax which could be imposed on the transaction.

15


Award Grant Period. No award shall be granted more than 10 years after May 2, 2007.

Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences. The following discussion is designed to provide a summary of the material Federal income tax consequences with respect to awards granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan as of the date of this proxy statement. Any entitlement to a tax deduction on the part of Gray is subject to the applicable Federal tax rules, including, those relating to the $1 million limitation on deductible compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and possible excise taxes on executives or loss of Gray’s deductions under Section 280G of the Code if the vesting of awards is accelerated on or in connection with a change in control of Gray.

  Base salary increase

Incentive Stock Options. Certain options granted or that may be granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan will be incentive stock options as defined in the Code, provided that such options satisfy the requirements under the Code applicable to incentive stock options. In general, neither the grant nor the exercise of any incentive stock option will result in taxable income to the optionee or a deduction to Gray. The sale of Gray common stock received upon the exercise of an option which satisfies all the requirements of an incentive stock option, as well as the holding period requirement described below, will result in a long term capital gain or loss to the optionee equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and the option price and will not result in a tax deduction to Gray. The exercise of an incentive stock option may have implications in the computation of the optionee’s alternative minimum tax. To receive capital gain or loss treatment upon the disposition of Gray common stock acquired through exercise of an incentive stock option, the optionee must not dispose of the Gray common stock purchased pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option within two years after the option is granted and must hold such Gray common stock for onlyat least one executive in 2010;

Nonequity incentive compensation paid at maximum in 2010 based on achievementyear after the transfer of Management Personnel Committee-approved and pre-determined financial and individual performance goals.such Gray common stock to the optionee.

     We

If all requirements for incentive stock option treatment other than the holding period rules are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for Gray’s compensationsatisfied, the recognition of its NEOs as described in this proxy statement. This advisory shareholder vote, commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay” vote, gives you as a shareholderincome by the opportunity to approve or not approve (on an advisory basis) the compensationoptionee is deferred until disposition of the NEOs that is disclosedGray common stock, but, in this proxy statement by voting for or against the following resolution (or by abstaining with respectgeneral, any gain in an amount equal to the resolution):

RESOLVED, thatlesser of (1) the shareholders of Gray Television, Inc. approve, on an advisory basis, the compensationfair market value of the Company’s executive officers who are named inGray common stock on the Summary Compensation Tabledate of exercise minus the Company’s Proxy Statementoption price or (2) the amount realized on the disposition minus the option price is treated as ordinary income. Any remaining gain is treated as long-term or short-term capital gain depending on the optionee’s holding period for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, as such compensation is disclosed in such Proxy Statement, pursuantstock that has been sold. Gray will generally be entitled to a deduction at that time equal to the disclosure rulesamount of ordinary income realized by the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related narrative discussion.
     Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on either the Board or the Company. However, Gray’s Management Personnel Committee will take into account the outcome of the shareholder vote on this proposal at the 2011 Annual Meeting when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” approval of the non-binding advisory resolution relating to the compensation of Gray’s Named Executive Officers disclosed in this proxy statement.optionee.

12


PROPOSAL 3
ADVISORY VOTE RELATING TO THE FREQUENCY (EVERY ONE, TWO OR THREE
YEARS) OF THE COMPANY’S FUTURE SHAREHOLDER NON-BINDING ADVISORY
VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
     The Dodd-Frank Act requires Gray’s shareholders to have the opportunity to cast a non-binding advisory vote regarding how frequently the Company should seek from its shareholders a non-binding advisory vote (similar to Proposal No. 2 above) on the compensation disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement of its NEOs.
     We are requesting your vote to advise us of whether you believe this non-binding shareholder vote relating to the compensation of Gray’s NEOs should occur every one, two or three years. The Board recommends that you support a frequency period of every three years (a triennial vote) for future non-binding “say on pay” votes.
     The Company, the Management Personnel Committee and the Board believe that it is appropriate and in the best interest of the Company for Gray’s shareholders to cast an advisory vote on executive compensation every three years, for the following reasons:
  As described

Nonqualified Stock Option. An optionee generally will realize no taxable income upon the grant of a nonqualified stock option and Gray will not receive a deduction at the time of such grant. Upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option, the optionee generally will realize ordinary income in Proposal 2, Gray’s compensation programs are designedan amount equal to attract, motivate and retain talented executive officers and are aligned with the long-term interestsexcess of Gray’s shareholders. The Company believes that determining whether executive compensation has been properly calibrated to Company performance is best viewed over a multi-year period rather than any single year (particularly given highly volatile economic conditions such as our industry has experiencedthe fair market value of the Gray common stock on the date of exercise over the last two fiscal years, as well as the fact that the realization of value ofexercise price. Upon a key componentsubsequent sale of the executive total compensation program —Gray common stock and otherby the optionee, the optionee will recognize short-term or long-term incentives — can onlycapital gain or loss depending upon his or her holding period for the Gray common stock. Gray will generally be measured overallowed a longer term time horizon).

Consistent with its approach to compensation, in the event that Gray was to receive an advisory vote disapproving of the Company’s compensation for its NEOs, the Board would want to understand its shareholders’ views that led to such vote and determine changes that would take into consideration the cyclical nature of our business. A triennial approach will provide the Management Personnel Committee enough time to consider and, if appropriate, implement changes in responsededuction equal to the Say-on-Pay Resolution for such changes to have meaningful impact.amount recognized by the optionee as ordinary income.

     For the reasons stated above, the Board is recommending a vote for a three-year frequency for the non-binding shareholder vote relating to the compensation of the Company’s NEOs. When considering the following resolution, note that shareholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the recommendation of the Board with respect to this proposal. Instead, each proxy card provides for four choices with respect to this proposal: a one, two or three-year frequency or an opportunity to abstain from voting on the proposal.
RESOLVED, that the option set forth below that receives the greatest number of votes cast by the shareholders of Gray Television, Inc. shall be deemed the preferred frequency of the Company’s shareholders for holding an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table of the Company’s proxy statement:

13


  every year;

SARs. Generally, no Federal income tax consequences are incurred by Gray or the holder at the time a SAR is granted pursuant to the 2007 Incentive Plan. However, upon the exercise of a SAR, the holder will generally realize ordinary income for Federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of cash or the value of property received by him or her. Gray generally will be entitled at such time to a deduction for Federal income tax purposes in the same amount realized as ordinary income. If a holder of a SAR receives Gray common stock upon

16


the exercise of such right and subsequently disposes of such Gray common stock, any gain or loss realized upon the sale will be either long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on the holder’s holding period for the Gray common stock that has been sold.

  every two years;

Restricted Stock Awards. The Federal income tax consequences of a restricted stock award granted under the 2007 Incentive Plan will depend, in large measure, on the restriction placed on the stock. In general, if the stock is “not transferable” and subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture,” then, unless the recipient makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code within 30 days of the grant, he or she will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the stock in the year the stock is either transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture over the price, if any, paid for the stock. If the recipient makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code, he or she will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the stock at the time of the award over the price, if any, paid for the stock.

Any gain or loss on a subsequent sale of the stock will be his or her long-term or short-term capital gain or loss depending on the recipient’s holding period for the stock. Gray will generally be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the recipient.

  every three years.

Performance Awards. A participant who is granted a performance award will recognize no income upon grant of the performance award. At the time the cash and/or stock is received as payment in respect of a performance award, the participant will realize compensation income equal to the sum of the cash and the fair market value of the shares received. Gray will generally be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the recipient.

Additional Information Regarding Plan Benefits

Reference is made to the sections captioned “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Decisions Made in 2011—Long-Term Incentive Grants,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2011” and “Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2011” for detailed information on stock incentive awards and exercises of such awards by certain executive officers under the 2007 Incentive Plan. Our named executive officers, other than Mr. Beizer, have received options to purchase common stock under the 2007 Incentive Plan as follows: Mr. Howell (173,062 shares), Mr. Prather (584,822 shares) and Mr. Ryan (132,398 shares). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Beizer did not receive any options to purchase common stock under the 2007 Incentive Plan. All current executive officers as a group have been granted options under the 2007 Incentive Plan to purchase 954,568 shares of common stock. In addition, options to purchase an aggregate of 793,200 shares have been granted to all employees of the Company as a group, excluding current executive officers, under the 2007 Incentive Plan.

Market Price of the Common Stock

As of April 2, 2012 the closing price of the Gray Class A common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange was $1.65 per share, and the closing price of the Gray common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange was $1.99 per share.

17


Plan Benefits

No grants have been made under the 2007 Incentive Plan that are subject to shareholder approval at the 2012 Annual Meeting. The Management Personnel Committee, which has functioned as the 2007 Plan Committee, currently expects that, if Amendment No. 1 is approved by Gray’s shareholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting, it will make grants of shares of restricted stock to each of Gray’s nonemployee directors, or director nominees, valued at $40,000. The following table shows the restricted stock that Gray expects will be granted to its current nonemployee directors, and director nominee, at the 2012 Annual Meeting. Other than these expected grants, it is not possible to determine specific amounts and types of awards that may be awarded in the future under the 2007 Incentive Plan because the grant and actual pay-out of awards under such plan is discretionary.

Nonemployee Director or
Director Nominee

  Dollar
Value
($)
   Number of
Shares of
Restricted Stock (1)
(#)
 

William E. Mayher, III

   40,000     20,101  

Richard L. Boger

   40,000     20,101  

Ray M. Deaver

   40,000     20,101  

T. L. Elder

   40,000     20,101  

Robin R. Howell

   40,000     20,101  

Howell W. Newton

   40,000     20,101  

Hugh E. Norton

   40,000     20,101  

Harriett J. Robinson

   40,000     20,101  

J. Mack Robinson

   40,000     20,101  

(1)Based on the closing price of $1.99 per share of Gray’s common stock on April 2, 2012, the most recent practicable date. The actual number of shares granted to each individual will be determined by reference to the closing price of Gray’s common stock on the grant date.

18


Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table gives information about the common stock and Class A common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2011.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category

  Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights

(in thousands)
(#)
  Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options
warrants and rights
   Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in 1st column)

(in thousands)
(#)
 

Common Stock:

     

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

   1,002 (1)  $7.50     7,383 (1)(2) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   —     $—       —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   1,002      7,383  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Class A Common Stock:

     

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

   —  (1)  $—       1,000 (1) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   —     $—       —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   —        1,000  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

(1)Under our 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, we are authorized to issue new awards of options to acquire up to 4,997,250 shares of either our common stock or our Class A common stock; however, of this amount, we cannot grant options to acquire in excess of 1,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock. For purposes of this disclosure, we have assumed the issuance of new awards of options to acquire 3,997,250 shares of our common stock and 1,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock, the maximum number of shares of Class A common stock issuable under the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan. We may, from time to time in the future, issue awards exercisable for more shares of common stock and fewer shares of Class A common stock.
(2)Includes 1,615,281 shares of our common stock that are issuable under our Capital Accumulation Plan, which is intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, and 770,000 shares of our common stock that are issuable under our Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholdersa vote FOR the amendments to conduct an advisory shareholder vote on the compensation of Gray’s Named Executive Officers every THREE years.

Gray Television, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan.

14

19


PROPOSAL 3

PROPOSAL 4
RATIFICATION OF COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2011

2012

Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm is appointed annually by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee examines a number of factors when selecting a firm, including the qualifications, staffing considerations, and the independence and quality controls of the firms considered. The Audit Committee has appointed McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2011.2012. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP has served as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2010since 2006 and is considered by management to be well-qualified.

Shareholder ratification of the selection of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required but is being presented to our shareholders as a matter of good corporate practice. Notwithstanding shareholder ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a new independent registered public accounting firm if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Should the shareholders not ratify the selection of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as Gray’s independent registered public accounting firm for 20112012 under this proposal, it is contemplated that the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP for the 20112012 fiscal year will nevertheless be permitted to stand unless the Audit Committee, on reconsideration, finds other compelling reasons for making a change.

Representatives of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP are expected to be present at the 20112012 Annual Meeting and, if present, will be given the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire, and to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2011.

2012.

15

20


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We are in compliance with the NYSE corporate governance rules. We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our directors, executive officers and employees. If any waiver of this Code of Ethics is granted, the waiver will be disclosed in an SEC filing on Form 8-K. Our Code of Ethics and the written charters of our Audit Committee and our Management Personnel Committee, which acts as our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee under separate charters, as well as our Corporate Governance Principles, are available under the headingGovernance Documentsin theCorporate Governancesection of our website atwww.gray.tv. All such information is also available in print to any shareholder upon request by telephone at (404) 266-8333.

After considering all applicable regulatory requirements and assessing the materiality of each director’s relationship with us, our Board has affirmatively determined that all of our directors are independent in accordance with Sections 303A.02(a) and (b) of the NYSE listing standards and the standards set forth in the IRC and the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), except for: (1) Mr. Robinson, due to his family relationship with Mrs. Robinson and Mr. Howell; (2) Mr. Prather, due to his status as an executive officer; (3) Mr. Howell, due to his status as an executive officer; and (4) Mrs. Robinson, due to her family relationships with Mr. Robinson and Mr. Howell. In addition, the Board has determined that Mrs. Howell is not independent due to her family relationship with Mrs. Robinson and Mr. Howell. Consequently, our Board has determined that sevensix of our eleventen current directors, and six of our ten director nominees, are independent in accordance with the listing standards of the NYSE and the standards set forth in the IRC and the Exchange Act.

In addition, the Board had previously determined that, prior to his retirement from the Board, Senator Miller was independent.

Gray encourages interested party communicationparties to communicate with its Board. Any interested party who wishes to communicate with the Board or with any particular director, including any independent director, may send a letter to our Secretary, Robert A. Beizer, 1750 K Street, NW, Suite 1200, Washington, D.C.Vice President Law and Development, Gray Television, Inc., 20006,4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319, which communications will be forwarded to the Board by the Secretary.Vice President Law and Development. Any communication should indicate that you are an interested party and clearly specify that such communication is intended to be made to the entire Board or to one or more particular directors.

The Board has adopted a policy that all directors on the Board are expected to attend annual meetings of the shareholders. All thethen-current members of our Board attended the 20102011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in person.

In accordance with Section 303A.03 of the NYSE listing standards, the independent non-management directors met in executive session four times during 2010.2011. Dr. Mayher, as the Chairman of the Board, presides over the executive sessions. Consistent with our belief that our leadership structure should reflect the best interests of the Company and our shareholders, we have not adopted a policy at this time stating whether or not the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board should be held by separate individuals. Rather, we believe that the Board should remain free to determine the leadership structure from time to time based upon the availability of qualified and competent candidates. Prior to August 2008, Mr. Robinson ably served as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Currently, Mr. Howell serves in the role of Chief Executive Officer, while Dr. Mayher, who is an independent director, serves as Chairman of the Board. We believe the resulting structure is appropriate for Gray at this time because it allows us to make the best use of the capabilities of these individuals in their respective roles while indicating to our shareholders that we also value the perspective of independent leadership on our Board. With respect to potential transactions with related parties required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 (a)404(a) of Regulation S-K, of the SEC,Audit Committee charter provides that the Audit Committee must review and approve such transactions in advance after full disclosure of the nature

21


and extent of the related party’s interest in any such transaction. SeeCertain Relationships and Related Party Transactionsfor a description of a business relationship Mr. Robinson had with Gray that was approved

16

The Company did not engage in any such related party transactions in 2011.


by the Audit Committee.
Management of the Company is responsible for the Company’s day-to-day risk management, and the Board serves in a risk management oversight role. The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling this oversight function. The Audit Committee and management of the Company periodically review various risks facing the Company and the internal controls and procedures in place to manage such risks. In addition, the Audit Committee and fullthe Board consider risk-related matters on an on-going basis in connection with deliberations regarding specific transactions and issues.

BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEMBERSHIP

The Board held sevenfour meetings during 2010.2011. During 2010,2011, each of the directors attended all of the meetings of the Board and meetings of all committees of the Board on which such directors served.

Our Board has an Executive Committee. The Executive Committee is authorized between meetings of the Board, to manage and direct our affairs, except as otherwise provided by law or as otherwise directed by the Board. All actions by the Executive Committee are subject to revision and alteration by the Board, provided that no rights of third parties shall be affected by any such revision or alteration. The Executive Committee did not meet during 2010.2011. The members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Howell, Mayher (as Chairman) and Prather.

Our Board has an Audit Committee, the purpose of which is to review and evaluate the results and scope of the audit and other services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as our accounting policies and system of internal accounting controls, and to review and approve any transactions between us and our directors, officers or significant shareholders.any related parties. The Audit Committee is governed by a written Audit Committee Charter, which was approved and adopted in its current form by the Board in June 2009 and can be found on our website atwww.gray.tv in theCorporate Governancesection under the headingGovernance Documents. The Audit Committee held fourfive meetings during 2010.2011. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Boger, Elder, Mayher and Newton (as Chairman). The Board has affirmatively determined that T.L. (Gene) Elder is an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined under applicable SEC rules. Our identification of Mr. Elder as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on him any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liabilities imposed on the other members of the audit committee.Audit Committee. The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are independent in accordance with NYSE and the SEC rules governing audit committee member independence. The Audit Committee maintains a risk assessment process designed to identify risks facing Gray that the Audit Committee considers to be the most significant. In executing this process, the Audit Committee receives reports from management and other advisors and strives to generate serious and thoughtful strategies to mitigate those risks. Management periodically meets with the Audit Committee and reviews such risks and the relevant strategies. The report of the Audit Committee is set forth in this proxy statement under the headingReport of Audit Committee.Committee

.

Our Board has a Management Personnel Committee that functions as both the Compensation Committee and the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee. The Management Personnel Committee has adopted separate written charters to govern its activities as the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, respectively, current copies of which are available on our website atwww.gray.tv in theCorporate Governancesection under the headingGovernance Documents. AsIn its capacity as the Compensation Committee, the Management Personnel Committee makes recommendations with respect to executive salaries, bonuses and long-term compensation. The Management

17


Personnel Committee held tenfour meetings in 2010,2011, during which

22


meetings it performed the functions of both the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Its current members are Messrs. Deaver (as Chairman), Mayher, Miller and Norton. Mr. Miller also served on the committee until his retirement in December 2011. The Board has affirmatively determined that all current members of the Management Personnel Committee are independent, and Senator Miller was independent, in accordance with NYSE, SEC and IRC rules governing independence. The report of the Management Personnel Committee is set forth in this proxy statement under the headingReport of Management Personnel Committee.Committee

.

In addition to acting as our Compensation Committee, the Management Personnel Committee also acts as our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In this function,capacity, the Management Personnel Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to shareholders by identifying and screening individuals qualified to become our directors, recommending candidates to the Board for all directorships, evaluating the set of corporate governance principles and guidelines applicable to us that the Board has adopted, and overseeing the evaluation of the Board and management. In recommending candidates to the Board for nomination as directors, the Management Personnel Committee strives to identify individuals who bring a unique perspective to Gray’s leadership and contribute to the overall diversity of our Board. Although the Management Personnel Committee has not adopted a specific written diversity policy for nominations, we believe that a diversity of experience, gender, race, ethnicity and age contributes to effective governance for the benefit of our shareholders. In practice, the Management Personnel Committee considers such characteristics together with the other qualities displayed by our candidates, such as judgment, skill, integrity and experience. The Management Personnel Committee does not assign a particular weight to these individual factors. Rather, the Management Personnel Committee looks for a mix of factors that, when considered along with the experience and credentials of the other candidates and existing directors, will provide shareholders with a diverse and experienced Board. Historically, we have not used a recruiting firm to assist with this process.

The Management Personnel Committee will consider recommendations for director nominees submitted by shareholders. The Management Personnel Committee’s evaluation of candidates recommended by our shareholders does not differ materially from its evaluation of candidates recommended from other sources. Shareholders wishing to recommend director candidates for consideration by the Management Personnel Committee may do so by writing to our Secretary,Vice President Law and Development, giving the candidate’s name, biographical data, qualifications and all other information that is required to be disclosed under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The foregoing information should be forwarded to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Robert A. Beizer, 1750 K Street, NW, Suite 1200, Washington, D.C.Vice President Law and Development, Gray Television, Inc., 20006.

4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319.

Our Board has a 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee, the purpose of which is to make recommendations concerning grants of stock options and stockequity awards under the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan and the Gray Television, Inc. Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan (the “Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan”).Plan. The 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee did not hold any meetings in 2010,2011, and its members are Messrs. Deaver, Mayher, Miller and Norton (as Chairman), all of which are “non-employee directors” under applicable SEC rules.

18

23


Summary of Committee Memberships.

Audit Committee

     
Audit Committee

Management Personnel Committee

Howell W. Newton as Chairman

  Ray M. Deaver as Chairman

Richard L. Boger

  William E. Mayher, III

T. L. Elder

  Zell B. Miller
William E. Mayher, III  Hugh E. Norton

William E. Mayher, III

  

2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee

Executive Committee
     

Executive Committee

Hugh E. Norton as Chairman

  William E. Mayher, III as Chairman

Ray M. Deaver

  Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

William E. Mayher, III

  Robert S. Prather, Jr.
Zell B. Miller

19

24


BENEFICIAL SHARE OWNERSHIP

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock and our common stock as of March 25, 201122, 2012 by (i) any person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our Class A common stock or our common stock, (ii) all directors,each director and director nominee, (iii) NEOseach executive officer named in the summary compensation table below and (iv) all directors and current executive officers as a group. For purposes of this table, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if he or she has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of such security. Accordingly, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities that such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of within 60 days. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. The information as to beneficial ownership has been furnished by the respective persons listed in the following table. The percentages of each class are based on 5,753,020 shares of Class A common stock and 51,392,98451,405,846 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 25, 2011.22, 2012. Shares underlying outstanding stock options exercisable within 60 days of such date are deemed to be outstanding for purposes of calculating the percentage owned by such holder.

                     
                  Combined
                  Voting
  Class A         Percent of
  Common Stock Common Stock Common
  Beneficially Owned Beneficially Owned and Class A
  (GTN.A) (GTN) Common
Name Shares Percent Shares Percent Stock
                     
Robert A. Beizer     *   16,181   *   * 
Richard L. Boger  36   *   9,071   *   * 
Ray M. Deaver     *   327,696   *   * 
T. L. Elder  2,000   *   21,000   *   * 
Hilton H.Howell, Jr.(l)(2)
  681,550   11.8%  378,413   0.7%  6.6%
William E. Mayher, III  13,500   *   139,750   *   * 
Zell B. Miller     *   20,500   *   * 
Howell W. Newton  2,625   *   25,225   *   * 
Hugh E. Norton  13,500   *   39,750   *   * 
Robert S. Prather, Jr.(3)  66,070   1.1%  763,045   1.5   1.3%
Harriett J. Robinson(2)(4)(5)  4,087,342   71.0%  1,569,818   3.1%  39.0%
J. Mack Robinson(2)(5)(6)  4,087,342   71.0%  1,569,818   3.1%  39.0%
James C. Ryan(7)     *   87,635   *   * 
Mario J. Gabelli(8)  238,275   4.1%  2,386,708   4.6%  4.4%
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(9)     *   3,027,726   5.9%  2.8%
FMR LLC(10)     *   7,427,397   14.5%  6.8%
BlackRock, Inc.(11)     *   3,424,125   6.7%  3.1%
Litespeed Management, L.L.C.(12)     *   2,740,944   5.3%  2.5%
All directors and executive officers as a group(13) (13 persons)  4,311,018   74.9%  3,227,084   6.2%  42.3%

20


Name

  Class A
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
(GTN.A)
  Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
(GTN)
  Combined
Voting
Percent of
Common
and Class A
Common
Stock
 
  Shares   Percent  Shares   Percent  

Robert A. Beizer

   —       *    16,181     *    *  

Richard L. Boger

   36     *    9,071     *    *  

Ray M. Deaver

   —       *    327,696     *    *  

T. L. Elder

   2,000     *    19,000     *    *  

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.(1)(3)

   683,326     11.9  406,993     0.8  6.6

Robin R. Howell(2)

   683,326     11.9  406,993     0.8  6.6

William E. Mayher, III

   13,500     *    139,750     *    *  

Howell W . Newton

   2,625     *    25,225     *    *  

Hugh E. Norton

   13,500     *    39,750     *    *  

Robert S. Prather, Jr.(4)

   66,070     1.1  763,045     1.5  1.3

Harriett J. Robinson(3)(5)(6)

   4,132,623     71.8  1,569,818     3.1  39.4

J. Mack Robinson(3)(6)(7)

   4,132,623     71.8  1,569,818     3.1  39.4

James C. Ryan(8)

   —       *    87,635     *    *  

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(9)

   —       *    3,164,217     6.2  2.9

FMR LLC(10)

   —       *    7,427,397     14.4  6.8

BlackRock, Inc.(11)

   —       *    2,987,866     5.8  2.7

Litespeed Management, L.L.C.(12)

   —       *    3,598,568     7.0  3.3

All directors and executiveofficers as a group(13) (12 persons)

   4,358,075     75.8  3,236,983     6.2  42.7

*Less than 1%.

25


(1)Includes 59,075 shares of the Class A common stock owned by Mr. Howell’s wife directly and as trustee for her children, as to which shares he disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes options to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock.
(2)Includes: (a) an aggregate of 454,706 shares of Class A common stock and 341,993 shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mrs. Howell’s husband, (b) options to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock held Mrs. Howell’s husband and (c) 500 shares of Class A common stock owned by Mrs. Howell as trustee for her children. Mrs. Howell disclaims beneficial ownership of all such securities. Also includes an aggregate of 169,545 shares of Class A common stock and 45,000 shares of common stock owned by certain companies of which Mrs. Howell is an officer and director. In addition, excludes shares beneficially held by Mrs. Robinson as trustee for the benefit of Mrs. Howell.
(3)Includes as to Messrs. Robinson and Howell and Mrs. Robinson, an aggregate of 555,605 shares of the Class A common stock and 151,000 shares of the common stock owned by certain companies of which Mr. Howell is an officer and a director, Mr. Robinson is an officer, director and a principal or sole shareholder and Mrs. Robinson is a director.
(3)(4)Includes options for Mr. Prather to purchase 500,000 shares of the common stock. Mr. Prather has pledged 199,771 shares of common stock as security for a loan.
(4)(5)Includes: (a) an aggregate of 1,002,676 shares of the Class A common stock and 853,868 shares of the common stock owned by Mrs. Robinson’s husband and (b) 1,189,180 shares of the Class A common stock and 109,750 shares of the common stock owned by Mrs. Robinson, as trustee for her daughters. Mrs. Robinson disclaims beneficial ownership of all such securities.
(5)(6)Includes as to Mr. Robinson and Mrs. Robinson, an aggregate of 490,298 shares of the Class A common stock and 100,000 shares of the common stock owned by Gulf Capital Services, Ltd., an entity controlled by Mr. Robinson.
(6)(7)Includes 2,038,7632,084,044 shares of the Class A common stock and 464,950 shares of the common stock owned by Mr. Robinson’s wife directly and as trustee for their daughters. Mr. Robinson disclaims beneficial ownership of all such securities.
(7)(8)Includes options for Mr. Ryan to purchase 75,000 shares of the common stock.
(8)This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC by Gabelli Funds, LLC and also by Mario J. Gabelli and various entities which he directly or indirectly controls or for which he acts as chief investment officer. The address of Mr. Gabelli and Gabelli Funds, LLC is One Corporate Center, Rye, New York 10580.
(9)This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2012 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. The address of Dimensional Fund Advisors L.P. is Palisades West, Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, Texas 78746.
(10)This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2011 by FMR LLC and also by Edward C. Johnson 3d and various entities which he directly or indirectly controls. The address of FMR LLC is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.
(11)

This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2012 by BlackRock, Inc. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 40 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022.

(12)This information is based solely on Gray’s review of a Schedule 13G13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2012 by Litespeed Management, LLC, Litespeed Master Fund, Ltd. and also by Jamie Zimmerman. The address of Litespeed Management, LLC is 237 Park Avenue, Suite 900, New York, New York 10017. The address of Litespeed Master Fund, Ltd is c/o BNY Alternative InvestmentOgier Fiduciary Services Ltd., 18 Church Street, Skandia House, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda.(Cayman) Limited, 89 Nexus Way, Camana Bay, Grand Cayman KY 1-9007, Cayman Islands. The address of Jamie Zimmerman is 237 Park Avenue, Suite 900, New York, New York 10017.
(13)The addresses for each of the directors and executive officers of Gray Television, Inc. is 4370 Peachtree Road N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319. Amount does not include shares of common stock held by Mr. Beizer, who retired from the Company on February 29, 2012.

26


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Management Personnel Committee

The Management Personnel Committee of the Board serves as our Compensation Committee, administers our executive compensation program and has the overall responsibility for approving and

21


evaluating director and officer compensation plans, policies and programs. The Management Personnel Committee, in its capacity as the Compensation Committee, approves the compensation of each of our executive officers and all television station General Managers and establishes the compensation of our Board. The Management Personnel Committee consists of fourthree members of our Board, Messrs. Deaver, Mayher, Miller and Norton. The Board has affirmatively determined that all members of the Management Personnel Committee are independent in accordance with NYSE, SEC and IRC rules governing independence.

The Management Personnel Committee engaged Grant Thornton LLP, an internationally recognized public accounting and consulting firm, to advise the committee, and at times management, with respect to Gray’s compensation programs for 2010.

2011.

Named Executive Officers

The discussion of executive compensation includes information about our NEOs who are listed in the following table:

             
  Executive    
  Officer    
Name Since Age Position
             
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.  2000   49  Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Robert S. Prather, Jr.  1996   66  President and Chief Operating Officer
James C. Ryan  1998   50  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Robert A. Beizer  1996   71  Vice President for Law and Development and Secretary

Name

  Executive
Officer
Since
 Age  

Position

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

  2000 50  Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

  1996 67  President and Chief Operating Officer

James C. Ryan

  1998 51  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Robert A. Beizer

  1996(1) 72  Vice President for Law and Development and Secretary

(1)Effective February 29, 2012, Mr. Beizer retired from all positions with the Company.

Overview of Previous Year Performance and Compensation

In 2010,2011, working with its independent compensation consultant, the Management Personnel Committee implemented a number ofcontinued to implement improvements to our executive compensation programs to further align themfor alignment with current market best practices, including:

Ensuring an appropriate benchmarking of executive roles to market data of the peer group, including both proxy data and published survey data, to determine the value of Gray’s executive positions;

Formalized a Management Personnel Committee-driven process, with input from outside consultants and management where appropriate;
Formalized a Management Personnel Committee-approved peer group for on-going competitive market comparisons;
Ensured an appropriate benchmarking of executive roles to market data of the peer group, including both proxy data and published survey data, to determine the value of Gray’s executive positions;
Established an executive compensation philosophy, with the target of calibrating Gray’s compensation amounts to the median (or 50th percentile) of our market peer group ;
Established a formalized annual incentive program, with market-competitive payments based on achievement of goals established at the beginning of each fiscal year; and
Applied

Modifying the annual incentive program to reflect achievement of quantifiable financial goals established at the beginning of each fiscal year; and

27


Applying new methodology and market data in making incentive compensation decisions for 2011, which resulted in:

Base salary increases for two executives in 2011; and

Nonequity incentive compensation decisions made in 2010;

No bonuses paid between target and maximum for 20092011 performance based on achievement of Management Personnel Committee-approved and pre-determined financial performance;
goals.

22


Base salary increase for only one executive in 2010;
Nonequity incentive compensation paid at maximum in 2010 based on achievement of Management Personnel Committee-approved and pre-determined financial and individual performance goals.
In fiscal year 2010,2011, Gray had strong performance in an improving economic environment, exceeding performance goalsenvironment. In addition, compensation decisions regarding Gray’s NEOs for 2011 and reflectinggoing forward in 2012 reflect the election year impact on the broadcast industry. Additionally, Gray completed a major refinancing effort that was critical to the ongoing successManagement Personnel Committee’s consideration of the Company. As a resultresults of this refinancing transaction, Gray’s management projects that the Company will benefit from significant savings over the next several years. The estimated savings reflect both reduced interest costslast year’s non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation.

For 2011 and reduced preferred stock dividends, net of the amortized refinancing costs.

     For 2010, and 2009, Gray paid cash compensation to its NEOs of $4,273,750$3,345,679 and $2,055,000,$4,273,750, respectively. The increasedecrease in cash compensation for each executive in 20102011 relative to 20092010 was primarily the result almost entirelyof the 2010 payment of performance-based bonuses for Messrs. Howell, Prather and Ryan in specific recognition of their successful efforts in completing a series of refinancing transactions in that year, partially offset by increases in base salaries for Messrs. Howell and Ryan and, for certain of the NEOs, increases in nonequity incentive compensation with the exception being a base salary market adjustment for Mr. Beizer. Mr. Beizer’s salary adjustment was based upon a review of his performance and competitive market levels for executives with similar responsibilities.in 2011. The following tables set forth the cash compensation paid to NEOs in 2011 and 2010, and 2009, respectively:
                 
  2010
          Nonequity  
          Incentive  
  Base     Plan Total Cash
  Salary Bonus Compensation Compensation
Name ($) ($) (S) (S)
                 
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.  400,000   350,000   360,000   1,110,000 
Robert S. Prather, Jr.  950,000   350,000   498,750   1,798,750 
James C. Ryan  350,000   350,000   157,500   857,500 
Robert A Beizer  350,000      157,500   507,500 
                 
   2,050,000   1,050,000   1,173,750   4,273,750 
                 
                 
  2009
          Nonequity  
          Incentive  
  Base     Plan Total Cash
  Salary Bonus Compensation Compensation
Name ($) ($) ($) ($)
                 
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.  400,000           400,000 
Robert S. Prather, Jr.  950,000         950,000 
James C. Ryan  350,000         350,000 
Robert A. Beizer  320,000   35,000      355,000 
                 
   2,020,000   35,000      2,055,000 
                 
     The Management Personnel Committee concluded that performance for 2009 did not merit any long-term incentive grants to the NEOs. The Management Personnel Committee did not award any long-term incentive grants to the NEOs for 2010.

23

   2011 

Name

  Base
Salary
($)
   Bonus
($)
   Nonequity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
   Total Cash
Compensation
($)
 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   500,000     —       413,181     913,181  

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   950,000     —       457,942     1,407,942  

James C. Ryan

   375,000     —       154,943     529,943  

Robert A. Beizer

   350,000     —       144,613     494,613  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2,175,000     —       1,170,679     3,345,679  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2010  

Name

  Base
Salary
($)
   Bonus
($)
   Nonequity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
   Total Cash
Compensation
($)
 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   400,000     350,000     360,000     1,110,000  

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   950,000     350,000     498,750     1,798,750  

James C. Ryan

   350,000     350,000     157,500     857,500  

Robert A. Beizer

   350,000     —       157,500     507,500  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2,050,000     1,050,000     1,173,750     4,273,750  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

28


Elements of Compensation for the Past Fiscal YearProgram

The compensation program for our executive officers is designed to provide the Management Personnel Committee with the flexibility to offer a combination of cash (fixed and incentive-based) and equity-based compensation toopportunity, as appropriate, in order align the executive officers’ interests with those of our shareholders. TheConsistent with 2010, the executive compensation program for 2011 primarily consistsconsisted of the following elements:

Base salary;

Base salary;
Annual incentive bonuses; and
Long-term incentive compensation, including equity-based awards

Annual incentive compensation opportunities; and

Long-term incentive compensation opportunities.

Each year, our executive officers are eligible for a base salary increase, an annual incentive award and a long-term incentive award based on the Management Personnel Committee’s evaluation of market data, Company and NEO performance, and achievement of goals.

The goals of our executive compensation program are to retain, motivate and reward our executive officers. We believe that the most effective executive compensation program is one that is conservative, yet competitive, and which aligns long-term compensation to the creation of shareholder value.

In 2010,2011, the Management Personnel Committee based compensation decisions on a defined a target market position of market median, or 50th percentile, with opportunity for total compensation between the 50th and 75th percentiles as warranted based on Gray’s performance determined through achievement of approved performance goals.

Additionally, the Management Personnel Committee approvedapplied a formal policy approved in 2010 for establishing compensation and incentive opportunity levels for each element of compensation.compensation, revising the annual, nonequity incentive structure to reflect achievement of quantitative goals only. Individual performance goals were not established or used in determining cash bonuses or nonequity incentive plan compensation that might be awarded under the 2011 Annual Incentive Plan. The Management Personnel Committee strives to achieve an appropriate mix between the different forms of compensation in order to (1) motivate the executive officers to deliver superior performance in the short-term by providing competitive base salaries, annual incentive payments and cash bonuses for specific achievements, (2) align the interests of the executive officers with the long-term interests of our shareholders through the grant of equity-based compensation and (3) provide an overall compensation package that promotes executive retention and is aligned with the defined target market position.

Base salaries for our executives are established or adjusted based on the size/complexity of the Company, the scope of each individual executive’s role, the knowledge and experience of such executive, and the competitiveness of the executive’s total compensation as compared to peer group and other market data.

The process for determining annual incentive compensation is based on how well, and to what extent, the achievement ofCompany performs against financial goals that are determined by the Management Personnel Committee-approved and pre-determined financial and individual goals.

Committee.

The decision to grant long-term incentives is generally discretionary in nature (as opposed to the formulaic approach to annual incentive compensation opportunities used by the Management Personnel Committee) and is based each year on a retrospective qualitative analysisevaluation of the following factors, which are evaluated by the Management Personnel Committee:

The Company’s financial performance over a one- to three-year period, including impact of political revenue in appropriate years and achievements in reduction of debt.
The Company’s common stock and Class A common stock share price performance over a one- to three-year period.
The Company’s overall performance and share price performance relative to its peer group.
Individual performance.

24

27


The 2010 annual incentiveCompany’s financial performance over a one- to three-year period, including the impact of political revenue in appropriate years and 2010 long-term incentive opportunity levels (expressed asachievements in reduction of debt;

The Company’s common stock and Class A common stock share price performance over a percentageone- to three-year period;

The Company’s overall performance and share price performance relative to its peer group; and

Competitiveness of base salary) approved by the Management Personnel Committee for the NEOs were as follows:current compensation levels.

                         
  Annual Incentive Opportunity Long-term Incentive Opportunity
Name Threshold Target Maximum Threshold Target Maximum
 
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.  30.0%  60.0%  90.0%  30.0%  60.0%  90.0%
Robert S. Prather, Jr.  17.5%  35.0%  52.5%  17.5%  35.0%  52.5%
James C. Ryan  15.0%  30.0%  45.0%  15.0%  30.0%  45.0%
Robert A. Beizer  15.0%  30.0%  45.0%  15.0%  30.0%  45.0%

Annual Incentive Performance Targets for 20102011

The Management Personnel Committee established performance goals for 2010 that are2011 based 75%100% on financial performance and 25% on individual performance. Three financial performance measures comprise the key financial performance measures historically used by Gray:Gray for purposes of valuing the Company’s business and approximating key financial performance covenants in certain financing agreements: (i) revenue (less agency commissions), (ii) broadcast cash flow, and (iii) NOP.

net operating profit (“NOP”).

Gray’s “NOP”NOP financial performance measure, by way of reference to Gray’s audited financial statements set forth in the Company’s Form 10-K, includes net income (loss), plus interest expense, plus income tax expense (benefit), plus loss on early extinguishment of debt, plus depreciation, plus amortization of intangible assets, plus impairment of goodwill and broadcast licenses, less net gain on disposaldisposals of assets, and less net miscellaneous income (expense) (see table below).

income.

Gray’s “broadcast cash flow” financial performance measure is defined as “NOP”NOP (discussed above) plus amortization of restrictednon-cash stock and stock option awards,based compensation, plus amortization of program broadcast rights, plus common stock contributed to 401(k) plan, less network compensation revenue, plus network compensation per network affiliation agreements, less network expense per network affiliation agreements, less payments on program broadcast obligations, and plus corporate and administrative expenses (excluding amortization of restrictednon-cash stock and stock option awards (see table below)based compensation).

25


     The following table reconciles Gray’s NOP and broadcast cash flow to net income (loss) for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
             
  2010 2009 2008
  ($) ($) ($)
  (in thousands)
Net income (loss)
  23,163   (23,047)  (202,016)
Adjustments to reconcile to net operating profit:            
Depreciation  30,630   32,595   34,561 
Amortization of intangible assets  479   577   792 
Impairment of goodwill and broadcast licenses        338,681 
Gain on disposals of assets, net  (1,909)  (7,628)  (1,632)
Miscellaneous income, net  (44)  (54)  53 
Interest expense  70,045   69,088   54,079 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt  349   8,352    
Income tax expense (benefit)  13,447   (11,260)  (111,011)
             
NOP
  136,160   68,623   113,507 
Adjustments to reconcile to Broadcast Cash Flow:            
Amortization of non-cash stock based compensation  332   1,388   1,450 
Amortization of program broadcast rights  15,410   15,130   16,070 
Common stock contributed to 401 (k) plan excluding corporate 401 (k) contributions  30   (19)  1,641 
Network compensation revenue recognized  (562)  (653)  (752)
Network (expense) compensation per network affiliation agreement  (196)  30   121 
Payments for program broadcast rights  (15,473)  (15,287)  (13,968)
Corporate and administrative expenses excluding amortization of non-cash stock-based compensation  13,213   12,780   12,647 
             
Broadcast Cash Flow
  148,914   81,992   130,716 
             
     Each of the three financial performance measures is weighted at 25% (to achieve the total 75%). The Management Personnel Committee established achievement of target broadcast cash flow as a “trigger” that must be met prior to the payment of incentives based on achievement of individual performance. This trigger applies only to the individual objectives; each financial performance measure is assessed individually.
For each of the financial performance measures, the following goals were established for 2010:
             
  Threshold Target Maximum
Financial Performance Measure ($) ($) ($)
  (in thousands)
Revenue (less agency commissions)  298,407   314,113   345,524 
NOP  103,219   108,652   119,517 
Broadcast cash flow  115,362   121,434   133,577 
     In 2010,2011:

Financial Performance Measure

  Threshold
($)
   Target
($)
   Maximum
($)
 
   (in thousands) 

Revenue (less agency commissions)

   282,950     297,842     327,626  

NOP

   85,347     89,839     98,823  

Broadcast cash flow

   95,902     100,949     111,044  

The target performance goals were aligned with the Management Personnel Committee also included individual performance objectives that reflected Gray’s strategic goals for 2010 (in addition to the revenue, broadcast cash flowCompany’s internal business plan and NOP components) into the formula for determining annual incentive amounts payable to our NEOs. As described above, only 75% of the annual incentive amounts were to be awarded based on the financial performance of the Company, while 25% of the incentive amounts were to be determined for Messrs.

26


Howell, Prather, Ryan and Beizer based on their respective achievement of individual performance objectivesbudget as approved by the Management Personnel Committee. Threshold goals were established at 95% of target so that a level of performance near target was required to be achieved before any incentive payment was awarded, with a significant reduction to the incentive earned for results below target. Maximum awards were established at achievement of 110% of target, as the Management Personnel Committee believed this represented an appropriate amount of stretch in the goals. The Management Personnel Committee believes that individual performance objectives should be included as a componentreviews the threshold, target and maximum criteria at the start of the annual incentive determinationeach fiscal year to ensure that these individuals remain focused on additional key objectives important to Gray’s future success.
an appropriate degree of difficulty is incorporated into the goals.

In 2011,2012, the Management Personnel Committee expects to maintain the current structure for the determination of annual incentive awards such that 75%100% of the annual incentive award opportunity will be based on Gray’s financial performance, utilizing the same performance metrics of revenue (less agency commissions), NOP and 25% ofbroadcast cash flow.

30


Response to Say-On-Pay Vote

Although the annual incentive award opportunity will be basedadvisory shareholder vote on the achievement of individual performance objectives thatexecutive compensation is non-binding, the Management Personnel Committee deems criticalhas considered, and will continue to consider, the achievementoutcome of Gray’s strategic objectivesthis vote each year such a vote is taken when making compensation decisions for our CEO and other NEOs. At our annual meeting of shareholders held on June 1, 2011, over 98% of the shares present or represented by proxy at the meeting voted for the approval of the compensation of the CEO and other NEOs. The Compensation Committee believes that this shareholder vote strongly endorses the compensation philosophy of the Company. After considering the result of the 2011 advisory vote on our executive compensation, the Management Personnel Committee did not believe it was necessary to undertake any material changes in 2011.

the Company’s executive compensation programs. In addition, the shareholders approved a triennial frequency for submitting our executive compensation program to an advisory shareholder vote in the future.

Compensation Decisions Made in 20102011

Base Salary

The base salary element of our executive compensation program provides each NEO with a fixed amount of annual cash compensation. Salaries for the NEOs are generally subject to annual review and adjustment by the Management Personnel Committee.

The Management Personnel Committee approved our NEOs’ base salaries for 20102011 on March 24, 2010, based significantly on the financial results of Gray’s operations in 2009 and our expectations, at the time, for comparable performance in 2010.17, 2011. The Management Personnel Committee determined to hold base salaries constant with the exception of Messrs. Howell and Ryan. Mr. Beizer, whoseRyan’s base salary was raised from $320,000increased to $350,000,better align his pay with market data. Mr. Howell’s base salary was increased, to (i) better align his base pay with that of other executives with similar job descriptions and responsibilities as assessed through the compensation study, (ii) rewardrecognize his pastcontributions and performance, and (iii) reflect the Management Personnel Committee’s awareness of an increase in the amountpercentage of time since his previous salary increase.

Mr. Howell is now devoting to the role.

The 2010 base salaries paid to each of our NEOs were as follows:

Salary Amount
Name($)
Hilton H.Howell, Jr.400,000
Robert S. Prather, Jr.950,000
James C. Ryan350,000
Robert A. Beizer350,000
follows for 2011 and 2010:

Name

  2011
Salary Amount
($)
   2010
Salary Amount
($)
 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   500,000     400,000  

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   950,000     950,000  

James C. Ryan

   375,000     350,000  

Robert A. Beizer

   350,000     350,000  

Mr. Howell’s 2010 and 2011 base salary also takestook into consideration the fact that in 2010 he worked less than full-time as our Chief Executive Officer while transitioning into that role.Officer. The Management Personnel Committee planswill continue to increasemonitor Mr. Howell’s base salary in the future, and make adjustments commensurate with his role as our Chief Executive Officer as he assumes greater responsibility in that role.

role and as the amount of time spent in the role increases.

Mr. Prather’s base salary is reflective of (i) the critical role he plays in managing Gray’s performance, (ii) his assigned responsibilities beyond the typical role of a Chief Operating Officer and

31


(iii) the significant institutional knowledge, history and relationships he maintains and leverages on behalf of the Company and its business goals.

27


Annual Incentive Compensation

The Management Personnel Committee meets during the first quarter of each year, once adequate financial and other performance data from the prior fiscal year becomes available for review, and determines if any annual incentive compensation and bonuses will be awarded to the executive officers and the amount of bonuses.

     In early 2010, the incentive compensation.

The 2011 opportunity levels (expressed as a percentage of base salary) approved by the Management Personnel Committee determined that nofor the NEOs in 2011 were as follows:

Name

  Annual Incentive Opportunity 
  Threshold  Target  Maximum 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   30.0  60.0  90.0

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   17.5  35.0  52.5

James C. Ryan

   15.0  30.0  45.0

Robert A. Beizer

   15.0  30.0  45.0

The annual incentive compensationopportunity levels were established to provide each NEO with a market-competitive incentive opportunity linked to achievement of pre-determined financial goals. Actual performance levels between threshold and target, or bonuses for 2009between target and maximum, are used to determine incentive awards. Actual awards are determined formulaically by linear interpolation of those actual results as they relate to the established financial performance goals and the percentage by which such goals were warranted based on performance.

achieved or exceeded.

Nonequity annual incentive compensation payments for 20102011 were calculated based on mid-December forecastactual results for 2011 and paid priorsubsequent to the end of the year, which is earlier than is typical, with a claw back provision should Gray’s 2010 financial statements, once finalized, generate a different amount. Upon completion of the audit of Gray’s 2010 financial statements, no adjustment to the 2010 incentive compensation payments were necessary. Nonequity incentive payments for all executives were paid at maximum reflecting outstanding company performance and individual performance.year. Annual incentive plan targets vs. Gray’s actual results for 20102011 were as follows:

                 
  Threshold Target Maximum Actual
Financial Performance Measure ($) ($) ($) ($)
  (in thousands)
Revenue (less agency commissions)  298,407   314,113   345,524   346,058 
NOP  103,219   108,652   119,517   136,160 
Broadcast cash flow  115,362   121,434   133,577   148,914 
     In addition to the Company’s exceeding the maximum targets on revenue, NOP and broadcast cash flow, the Management Personnel Committee determined that each of the NEOs exceeded their respective individual performance objectives as approved by the Management Personnel Committee. As such, the

Financial Performance Measure

  Threshold
($)
   Target
($)
   Maximum
($)
   Actual
($)
 
   (in thousands)     

Revenue (less agency commissions)

   282,950     297,842     327,626     307,131  

NOP

   85,347     89,839     98,823     98,762  

Broadcast cash flow

   95,902     100,949     111,044     109,595  

32


The following annual incentive compensation payments were made for 20102011 performance:

                         
  Incentive Payment For Exceeding      
  Revenue                 Total Incentive
  (net of agency     Broadcast     Total Payment as a
  commissions) NOP Cash Flow Individual Incentive Percentage of
  Goal Goal Goal Goal Payment Base Salary
Name ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) (%)
                         
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.  90,000   90,000   90,000   90,000   360,000   90.0%
RobertS.Prather, Jr.
  124,688   124,688   124,687   124,687   498,750   52.5%
James C. Ryan  39,375   39,375   39,375   39,375   157,500   45.0%
Robert A. Beizer  39,375   39,375   39,375   39,375   157,500   45.0%
                         
   293,438   293,438   293,437   293,437   1,173,750     
                         

28


Name

  Incentive Payment For Exceeding         
  Revenue
(net of  agency
commissions)
Goal
($)
   NOP
Goal
($)
   Broadcast
Cash Flow
Goal
($)
   Total
Incentive
Payment
($)
   Total Incentive
Payment as a
Percentage of
Base Salary
(%)
 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   86,696     112,249     214,236     413,181     82.6

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   96,088     124,410     237,444     457,942     48.2

James C. Ryan

   32,511     42,093     80,339     154,943     41.3

Robert A. Beizer

   30,344     39,287     74,982     144,613     41.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
   245,639     318,039     607,001     1,170,679    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Refinancing Transaction Bonus
     The Management Personnel Committee approved the creation of a bonus pool as a result of Gray’s refinancing its capital structure in April 2010. Not only was the refinancing critical to the ongoing success of the Company, Gray’s management projects that the Company will benefit from significant savings. The estimated savings reflect both reduced interest costs and reduced preferred stock dividends, net of the amortized refinancing costs.
     Cash in the bonus pool amounted to $1,250,000 for all transaction-related bonuses to be paid to executive officers and employees. The bonus pool represented 0.34% of the size of the transaction (in terms of the cost of debt and redemption of preferred stock), approximately 7.4% of the projected one-year savings, approximately 2.5% of the projected savings over a three-year period, and approximately 1.5% of the projected savings over a five-year period.
     The following bonuses were paid to NEOs who played a significant role in the completion of the refinancing transaction:
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.: $350,000
Robert S. Prather, Jr.: $350,000
James C. Ryan: $350,000
     The transaction bonus payments include a claw back provision requiring pro-rated repayment of the bonus if a recipient voluntarily resigns within three years from time of payment.
     Prior to approving the bonus payments, the Management Personnel Committee asked Grant Thornton LLP to assess the impact of the proposed bonuses on the market competitiveness of the executives’ compensation. The cumulative impact of the bonuses when combined with target annual and long-term incentive amounts placed the total direct compensation opportunity for the executive group at the 75th percentile, which is slightly above the Management Personnel Committee’s targeted position of between median and the 75th percentile for outstanding performance, but still acceptable from a competitive standpoint based on Gray’s performance for 2010 and achievements of the NEOs.
Long-Term Incentive Grants

In order to align the interests of our executive officers and other key management personnel responsible for our growth with the interests of our shareholders, we established the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, which provides for equity-based awards. ItIf stock options are awarded, it is our practice to grant options with an exercise price equal to the closing price of our Class A common stock and/or our common stock on the date of grant.

Long-term incentive grant guidelines are used by the Management Personnel Committee to determine and understand market competitive parameters for making long term incentive award decisions. Unlike the formulaic annual incentive award opportunities, which are tied to the Company’s actual performance compared to goals, the decision to grant long-term incentive awards generally remains within the discretion of the Management Personnel Committee.

The long-term incentive grant guidelines (expressed as a percentage of base salary) considered by the Management Personnel Committee for the purpose of consideration of long-term incentive awards in 2011 remained unchanged from those approved by the Management Personnel Committee in 2010, and were as follows:

Name

  Long-term Incentive Opportunity Guidelines 
  Threshold  Target  Maximum 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   30.0  60.0  90.0

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   17.5  35.0  52.5

James C. Ryan

   15.0  30.0  45.0

Robert A. Beizer

   15.0  30.0  45.0

The decision of whether or not to make long-term incentive grants in any year is based on a retrospective and qualitative assessment of factors, as discussed above under the headingElements of Compensation for the Past Fiscal YearProgram. The Management Personnel Committee concluded that performance for 2009 did not merit any long-term incentive grants to the NEOs. The Management Personnel Committee did not award any long-term incentive grants to the NEOs for 2010.

in 2011. Based upon 2011 performance, in 2012, the Management Personnel Committee approved grants of long-term incentive awards to certain NEOs effective April 2, 2012. Important to the Management Personnel Committee’s decision to award these long-term incentive grants,

29

33


were the Company’s and the individual’s performance in 2011, the fact that long-term incentive equity grants had not been made in recent years, total shareholder return as compared to the Company’s peer group, and competitiveness of each NEO’s total compensation. The Management Personnel Committee approved awards equal to the 2011 “target” opportunity guidelines for Messrs. Howell and Ryan, and equal to the “threshold” opportunity guideline for Mr. Prather, given the competitiveness of Mr. Prather’s current total compensation. No award was considered for Mr. Beizer due to his retirement.

This resulted in the following value-based awards being granted by the Management Personnel Committee:

Mr. Howell: $300,000 award, 60% of his 2011 base salary ;

Mr. Prather: $166,250 award, 17.5% of his 2011 base salary; and

Mr. Ryan: $112,500 award, 30% of his 2011 base salary.

After considering the mix of awards provided by peer group companies to similarly situated executives, and the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, the Management Personnel Committee approved an award mix intended to provide a balance between retention and performance improvement, with 50% of the value to be delivered through restricted stock grants with three-year ratable vesting, and 50% of the value to be delivered through stock option grants with four-year ratable vesting and a ten-year contractual term. The number of restricted shares granted was determined by dividing one-half of the grant value by the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date of the award, rounded up to the nearest whole number of shares. The number of options granted was determined by dividing one-half of the grant value by the fair value of a stock option as determined using the Black-Scholes Merton valuation method, rounded up to the nearest whole number of options.

Qualified Benefit Plans

The executive officers participate in the following qualified benefit plans in which all employees are eligible to participate: the Gray Television, Inc. Capital Accumulation (401(k)) Plan (“Capital Accumulation Plan”) and the Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan (“Pension Plan”). Mr. Ryan also participates in the Busse Pension Plan (the “Busse Pension Plan”). The Company acquired Busse Broadcasting Corporation (“Busse”) in July 1998 and the Busse Pension Plan was assumed in that transaction. Mr. Ryan is a former employee of Busse. The table in the section entitledPension Benefitsherein lists the years of credited service and the present value of each NEO’s accumulated pension benefit, assuming payment begins at age 65, under the pension plans.

Capital Accumulation Plan

We currently sponsor the Gray Television, Inc. Capital Accumulation Plan to encourage eligible employees to defer a part of their current income to provide for their retirement, death or disability under the provisions of Section 401(k) of the IRC. The plan covers all of our employees. Under the Capital Accumulation Plan, participants may elect to make pre-tax savings deferrals from their compensation each year, subject to annual limits on such deferrals imposed by the IRC. We may also, at our discretion, on an annual basis, make a matching contribution with respect to a participant’s elective deferrals and/or may make additional voluntary contributions. For the year ended December 31, 2010,2011, we did not match employee contributions except for employees at one of our stations, in accordance with the terms of their union contract. Participants are immediately vested in their voluntary contributions plus the actual earnings thereon. Employer contributions and earnings thereon become 100% vested after the participant completes three years of service. The only form of benefit payment under the Capital Accumulation Plan is a single lump-sum payment equal to the vested balance in the participant’s account. The vested portion of a participant’s accrued benefit is payable upon such employee’s termination of employment, attainment

34


of age 59 1/2, retirement, total and permanent disability, or death. Participants may also make in-service withdrawals from their pre-tax contributions under the plan for certain specified instances of hardship.

Gray Television, Inc. RetirementPension Plan

Under the terms of the Pension Plan, in the event of the death of an executive officer before retirement, 50% of the accrued benefit will become payable to the surviving spouse at the time the deceased participant would have reached age 65. If the deceased participant had completed ten or more years of service, the survivor benefit may commence as early as the time the deceased participant would have reached age 55. If the deceased participant would have been eligible for early retirement at the time of death, survivor benefits may commence as soon as practicable. Any benefits that commence before the deceased participant would have reached age 65 will be reduced the same as early retirement benefits would have been reduced. In the event a disability occurs before retirement, the accrued benefit will become payable at age 65. No break in service will occur and benefits will continue to accrue during disability. In the event of voluntary termination, the vested accrued benefit will become payable at age 65. If the participant had completed ten or more years of service, the benefit may commence as early as age 55. If the participant had completed less than five years of credited service, the accrued benefit is not vested, and no future benefits would be payable from the Pension Plan.

30


Compensation Framework: Policies, Process and Risk Considerations.

Determining Competitive Practices

     For

In 2010, Gray established a new, expanded compensation peer group for purposes of determining competitive compensation for our executive officers. The Management Personnel Committee spent considerable time reviewing the peer group initially proposed by Grant Thornton LLP, and closely examined the included companies before finalizing the new peer group. The peer group selection criteria included broadcasting companies (television, radio, and companies with a combination)combination of television and radio operations). As a general guideline, companies were included with revenues of one-half of Gray’s revenue and up to two times Gray’s revenue, with median revenue of the peer group closely aligned with Gray’s revenue.

The newly approvedcompensation peer group originally consisted of seventeen (17) companies, including Belo Corp, Crown Media Holdings, Inc., Cox Radio Inc., Cumulus Media, Inc., Emmis Communications, Entercom Communications Corp, Entravision Communications, Fisher Communications, Inc., Lin TV Corp., Media General, Hearst-Argyle Television, Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Radio One Inc., Salem Communications Corp., Sinclair Broadcast GP, Spanish Broadcasting Sys Inc, and Westwood One Inc. The new peer group has a median revenue closely aligned with Gray and better protects against potential volatility in data that may result from changes in peer group company status. Two of the companies, Cox Radio Inc., and Hearst-Argyle Television, are no longer public and willwere not be included in futurethe 2011 peer group benchmarking analysis.

The Management Personnel Committee uses this expandedthe peer group for executive compensation comparisons, and ensured an appropriate benchmarking of executive roles to market data, including both proxy data (weighted at 75%) and published survey data (weighted at 25%) to determine the market value of Gray’s executive positions.

Process for Establishing Executive Total Compensation

In reviewing NEO compensation levels for 2010,2011, the Management Personnel Committee reviewed a competitive market study prepared by Grant Thornton LLP. The study compared Gray’s practices regarding base salary, bonus, equity, cash incentives, perquisites and other compensation of its NEOs with market practices as reported in published survey data and for the newly approved peer group. The Management Personnel Committee applied, to the best of its ability, the new process approved for assessing performance for annual and long-term incentives retrospectively to performance for 2009.

     As reference, theSummary Compensation Tabledetails the compensation set by the Management Personnel Committee in 2010 for our NEOs.

35


Risk Considerations

Companies are expected to review their compensation policies and practices and incentive plans and programs to evaluate if such compensation policies and practices and incentive plans and programs are appropriately structured for the company and its business objectives and discourage executives from taking excessive risk. In designing the components of Gray’s compensation policies and practices and incentive plans and programs, we have attempted to mitigate the possibility that excessive short-term risks are being taken at the expense of long-term value. These mitigation strategies include: (1) the annual review and approval of the financial performance considerations by the Management Personnel Committee; (2) the use of multiple performance objectives, thus mitigating too heavy a focus on any one in particular; and (3) vesting of stock awards over time to motivate NEOs to focus on providing

31


consistent results over the longer term. The Management Personnel Committee has reviewed Gray’s compensation policies and practices and incentive plans and programs, including all of its business units, to determine if they encourage individuals to take unreasonable risks; and has determined that any risks arising from these compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

In 2010,2011, the Management Personnel Committee engaged Grant Thornton LLP, an internationally recognized public accounting and consulting firm, to advise the Management Personnel Committee with respect to Gray’s compensation programs for 2010.2011. A Grant Thornton LLP representative reports directly to the Management Personnel Committee as its compensation advisor. The Management Personnel Committee annually reviews the role of its compensation advisor and believes that the advisor is fully independent for purposes of providing executive compensation recommendations. To ensure independence, the managementManagement Personnel Committee directly hires and has the sole authority to terminate the compensation advisor and to determine the terms and conditions of their engagement. The compensation advisor reports directly to the Management Personnel Committee. Mr. Howell may participate in meetings in his role as CEO to provide information to the Management Personnel Committee inand answer questions related to management and performance of Gray, but is not present when the Management Personnel Committee goes into executive sessions that are not attended by any of Gray’s officers.

session to make executive officer compensation decisions.

Annual Review of Consultant Independence

As a result of the steps taken by the Management Personnel Committee to monitor and manage the independence of its dedicated compensation advisor,consultant, the Management Personnel Committee believes that the advisor is able to provide candid, direct and objective advice to the Management Personnel Committee that is not influenced by management or any other services provided to Gray by Grant Thornton LLP. Furthermore, neither the compensation advisor nor any member of the advisory team participates in any of the other services provided to Gray by separate Grant Thornton LLP business units. Instead, with full knowledge of the Management Personnel Committee, the Audit Committee engages a distinct unit of Grant Thornton LLP to provide all other non-Management Personnel Committee consulting services to Gray, which is primarily related to internal audit services. Grant Thornton LLP provides the Management Personnel Committee with an annual update on its services and related fees. The Management Personnel Committee determines whether the separate services are performed objectively and free from the influence of management. The Management Personnel Committee recommended and approved the provision of these separate services to Gray.

Income Deduction Limitations

Section 162(m) of the IRC generally sets a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct for federal income tax purposes in any given year with respect to the compensation of

36


each of the executive officers. However, certain “performance-based” compensation that complies with the requirements of Section 162(m) is not included in the calculation of the $1 million cap. Historically, tax deductibility of officer compensation has not been a primary objective because of ongoing operating losses on a tax basis and the need for flexibility in pursuing our incentive and retention objectives. Our executive compensation program historically has not complied with all the requirements of Section 162(m), but the Management Personnel Committee will review such requirements and will consider ways to restructure the executive compensation program to satisfy our compensation goals and meet the 162(m) deductibility guidelines going forward. We reserve the right to design compensation plans that recognize a full range of performance and other criteria important to our success regardless of the federal tax deductibility of compensation paid under those plans.

32


Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the other named executive officers for 2011, 2010 and 2009, and 2008, respectively.

                                     
                          Change in    
                          Pension    
                          Value and    
                      Nonequity Nonqualified    
                      Incentive Deferred    
              Stock Option Plan Compensation All Other  
Name and     Salary(2) Bonus(3) Awards(4) Awards(5) Compensation(6) Earnings(7) Compensation(8) Total
Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
 
Hilton H.Howell, Jr.
  2010   400,000   350,000         360,000   22,617   63,252   1,195,869 
Vice Chairman,
  2009   400,000               14,839   59,387   474,226 
Chief Executive
  2008   170,765      24,700   36,000      16,321   65,174   312,960 
Officer
and Director(l)
                                    
 
Robert s. Prather, Jr.
  2010   950,000   350,000         498,750   38,815   103,424   1,940,989 
President
  2009   950,000               43,406   103,934   1,097,340 
Chief Operating
  2008   950,000      24,700   900,000      47,056   114,294   2,036,050 
Officer and
Director
                                    
 
James C. Ryan
  2010   350,000   350,000         157,500   33,277   14,298   905,075 
Senior Vice
  2009   350,000               14,227   13,571   377,798 
President and
  2008   350,000         135,000      27,442   20,010   532,452 
Chief Financial
Officer
                                    
 
Robert A. Beizer
  2010   350,000            157,500   35,967   23,038   566,505 
Vice President-
  2009   320,000   35,000            17,939   33,792   406,731 
Law and
  2008   320,000               32,706   28,078   380,784 
Development
and Secretary
                                    

Name and

Principal

Position

  Year   Salary(1)
($)
   Bonus(2)
($)
   Stock
Awards
($)
   Option
Awards
($)
   Nonequity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-
sation(3)
($)
   Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
($)
   All  Other
Compen-
sation(5)
($)
   Total
($)
 
                  
                  

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   2011     500,000     —       —       —       413,181     53,629     54,252     1,021,062  

Vice Chairman,

   2010     400,000     350,000     —       —       360,000     22,617     63,252     1,195,869  

Chief Executive Officer and Director

   2009     400,000     —       —       —       —       14,839     59,387     474,226  

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   2011     950,000     —       —       —       457,942     50,775     116,928     1,575,645  

President,

   2010     950,000     350,000     —       —       498,750     38,815     125,424     1,962,989  

Chief Operating Officer and Director

   2009     950,000     —       —       —       —       43,406     125,934     1,119,340  

James C. Ryan

   2011     375,000     —       —       —       154,943     84,224     14,478     628,645  

Senior Vice

   2010     350,000     350,000     —       —       157,500     33,277     14,298     905,075  

President and Chief Financial Officer

   2009     350,000     —       —       —       —       14,227     13,571     377,798  

Robert A. Beizer

   2011     350,000     —       —       —       144,613     47,870     22,857     565,340  

Vice President-

   2010     350,000     —       —       —       157,500     35,967     23,038     566,505  

Law and Development and Secretary

   2009     320,000     35,000     —       —       —       17,939     33,792     406,731  

(1)For 2008, Mr. Howell’s annual base salary was $125,000 from January 1, 2008 until August 2008 when he became Gray’s Chief Executive Officer and his annual base salary was increased to $250,000.
(2)Each of the NEOs contributed a portion of his salary to our Capital Accumulation Plan. The disclosed salary amounts are before the NEOsNEOs’ contributions.

37


(3)(2)

For 2010, Messrs. Howell, Prather and Ryan received bonuses for their work on behalf of the Company in obtaining an amendment of our senior credit facility and the issuance of our 101/2% senior secured second lien notes due 2015. For 2009, Mr. Beizer received a bonus of $35,000 as a result of his work on behalf of the Company in obtaining long-term signal carriage agreements with cable and satellite companies.

(4)Amounts represent the fair value of stock grants as of the date of grant in 2008 computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board’s ASC Topic 718 (“ASC 718”). We did not grant any stock to our NEOs in 2010 or 2009. For additional information with respect to the 2008 grants, refer to Note 8 — Stock-Based Compensation in the consolidated audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

33


(5)Amounts represent the fair value of stock options as of the date of grant in 2008 computed in accordance with ASC 718. We did not grant any stock options to our NEOs in 2010 or 2009. For additional information on the valuation assumptions with respect to the 2008 grants, refer to Note 8 — Stock-Based Compensation in the consolidated audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
(6)(3)For 2011 and 2010, Messrs. Howell, Prather, Ryan and Beizer received annual incentive compensation for the Company reaching certain predetermined financial performance goals for 2011 and financial and individual goals for 2010.
(7)(4)Represents for 2011, the change in pension value, calculated as the difference between the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2011, and the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2010, adjusted for benefit payments made during the year. Represents for 2010, the change in pension value, calculated as the difference between the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2010, and the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2009, adjusted for benefit payments made during the year. Represents for 2009, the change in pension value, calculated as the difference between the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2009, and the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2008, adjusted for benefit payments made during the year. Represents for 2008, the change in pension value, calculated as the difference between the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2008, and the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2007, adjusted for benefit payments made during the year. The present values of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009 were calculated using the assumptions that were used for the December 31, 2011, 2010 2009 and 20082009 financial statement disclosures, which were the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Tables for the Pension Plan, and the RP 2000 Projected Mortality Table for the Busse Pension Plan, separately for males and females, and a 5.85%4.84%, 6.27%5.85% and 5.79%6.27% interest discount, respectively. See the table in the section entitledPension Benefitsherein for additional information, including the present value assumptions used in this calculation.
(8)(5)See theAll Other Compensation Tablebelow for additional information.

34

38


All Other Compensation Table

The following table describes each component of the amounts in theAll Other Compensation column of theSummary Compensation Tablefor 2010:

                             
              Company      
      Dividends     Contributions Company    
      Paid on Discounted to Defined Paid    
      Stock Securities Contribution Insurance Directors’  
      Awards(1) Purchases(2) Plans(3) Premiums(4) Fees(5) Total
Name Year ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
 
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.  2010            7,252   56,000   63,252 
   2009      1,832      7,555   50,000   59,387 
   2008   1,890   3,825   6,623   2,836   50,000   65,174 
 
Robert S. Prather, Jr.  2010            47,424   56,000   103,424 
   2009      2,978      50,956   50,000   103,934 
   2008   25,290   3,825   3,840   31,339   50,000   114,294 
 
James C. Ryan  2010            14,298      14,298 
   2009            13,571      13,571 
   2008         7,750   12,260      20,010 
 
Robert A. Beizer  2010            23,038      23,038 
   2009            33,792      33,792 
   2008         5,247   22,831      28,078 
2011:

Name

  Company
Contributions
to Defined
Contribution
Plans
($)
   Company
Paid
Insurance
Premiums
($)
   Directors’
Fees(1)
($)
   Total
($)
 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   —       7,252     47,000     54,252  

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   22,000     47,928     47,000     116,928  

James C. Ryan

   —       14,478     —       14,478  

Robert A. Beizer

   —       22,857     —       22,857  

(1)Represents dividends paid to each NEO in 2008 on all awards of restricted common stock. Messrs. Prather and Howell received grants of restricted common stock in their capacities as directors. Dividends are paid on all shares of restricted stock despite any vesting schedule and in a manner consistent with all other outstanding common shares. We did not declare or pay any dividends on any of our outstanding common stock in 2010 or 2009.
(2)Represents the amount of expense recognized by us, associated with the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), for each NEO in 2009 and 2008, respectively. We offered the ESPP to eligible employees (including the NEOs) to provide participants with an opportunity to purchase our common stock through payroll deductions as a long-term investment. Effective June 30, 2009, we discontinued our ESPP due to the considerable costs associated with maintaining the plan. Messrs. Howell and Prather each participated in the ESPP in 2009 and 2008. The ESPP was intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the IRC. The price per share at which shares of common stock were eligible for purchase under the ESPP during 2009 and 2008 was 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the last day of the purchase period.
(3)Represents the amount of expense recognized by us for employer matching contributions during 2008 for the Capital Accumulation Plan for each NEO.
(4)Represents insurance premiums paid on behalf of each NEO.
(5)Represents directors’ fees paid to each NEO in 2010, 2009 and 2008 who is also a director. See theDirector Compensationtable for additional information.

35


Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2010
2011

Nonequity annual incentive compensation payments were made to our NEOs in 2010 as2011 based upon the incentive opportunities set forth underin the headingCompensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Decisions Made in 2010 — Annual Incentive Compensation. Please see the discussion and charts under that heading on page 28 of this proxy statement.

following table.

   Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (1)
   Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
   

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

   

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

   Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
 

Name

  Threshold
($)
   Target
($)
   Maximum
($)
   Threshold
(#)
   Target
(#)
   Maximum
(#)
   or Units
(#)
   Options
(#)
   Awards
($/Sh)
   Option
Awards
 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   150,000     300,000     450,000     —       —       —       —       —       —       —    

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   166,250     332,500     498,750     —       —       —       —       —       —       —    

James C. Ryan

   56,250     112,500     168,750     —       —       —       —       —       —       —    

Robert A. Beizer

   52,500     105,000     157,500     —       —       —       —       —       —       —    

(1)For information on actual payouts under nonequity incentive plan awards for 2011 performance, see the column titled “Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table above.

39


Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2010

2011

The following table provides information on the stock option awards and restricted stock awards held by the NEOs at December 31, 2010. Each stock option award is shown separately for each of the NEOs.2011. The stock option award exercise prices shown below are rounded to two decimal points.

                         
  Option Awards
          Number of Number of    
          Securities Securities    
          Underlying Underlying    
          Unexercised Unexercised Option  
      Option Options Options Exercise Option
  Class Grant Exercisable Unexercisable Price Expiration
Name of Stock Date (#) (#) ($) Date
                         
Hilton H. Howell, Jr. Common (1)  02/01/08   20,000      7.64   02/01/13 
                         
Robert S. Prather, Jr. Common (1)  02/01/08   500,000      7.64   02/01/13 
                         
James C. Ryan Common (1)  02/01/08   75,000      7.64   02/01/13 
                         
Robert A. Beizer                  
(1)Options vested on February 1, 2010.

36


     The following table provides information on restricted stock awards held by the NEOs at December 31, 2010. Each restricted stock award is shown separately for each of the NEOs. The vesting schedule for each restricted stock award is shown following the stock awards table. The market value of the stock awards is based on our common stock closing market price of $1.87$1.62 per share as of December 31, 2010.
                 
  Stock Awards
              Market
          Number of Value
          Shares or of Shares
          Units of or Units of
      Stock Stock That Stock That
      Award Have Not Have Not
  Class Grant Vested(1) Vested(1)
Name of Stock Date (#) ($)
 
Hilton H. Howell, Jr. Common  01/01/07   1,000   1,870 
  Common  03/12/08   2,000   3,740 
 
Robert S. Prather, Jr. Common  01/01/07   1,000   1,870 
  Common  03/12/08   2,000   3,740 
 
James C. Ryan            
 
Robert A. Beizer            
30, 2011 (the last trading day of 2011).

   Stock Option Awards (1)   Stock Awards (1) (2) 

Name

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Exercisable
(#)
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number

of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options

(#)
   Option
Exercise
Price
($)
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Number
of Shares
or Units

of Stock
They Have
Not
Vested

(#)
   Market
Value of
Shares  or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested

($)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or

Other
Rights That
Have  Not

Vested
(#)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value

of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not

Vested
($)
 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   20,000     —       —       7.64     2/1/2013     1,000     1,620     —       —    

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   500,000     —       —       7.64     2/1/2013     1,000     1,620     —       —    

James C. Ryan

   75,000     —       —       7.64     2/1/2013     —       —       —       —    

Robert A. Beizer

   —       —       —       —       —       —       —       —       —    

(1)All outstanding stock option awards and stock awards are for common stock.
(2)Awards vest in five equal, annual installments beginning on the last day of the year they were granted.

40


Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2010

2011

The following table provides information, for the NEOs, on the number of shares of stock awards vested in 20102011 and the value realized by each before payment of any applicable withholding tax.

                     
      Option Awards Stock Awards
      Number     Number  
      of Shares Value of Shares Value
      Acquired Realized Acquired Realized
  Class on Exercise on Exercise on Vesting on Vesting
Name of Stock (#) ($) (#) ($)
                     
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.(l) Common        3,000   5,610 
                     
Robert S. Prather, Jr.(l) Common        3,000   5,610 
                     
James C. Ryan               
                     
Robert A. Beizer               

       Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

  Class
of Stock
   Number
of Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
   Value
Realized
on Exercise
($)
   Number
of Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
   Value
Realized
on Vesting
($)
 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.(1)

   Common     —       —       2,000     3,240  

Robert S. Prather, Jr.(1)

   Common     —       —       2,000     3,240  

James C. Ryan

   —       —       —       —       —    

Robert A. Beizer

   —       —       —       —       —    

(1)Messrs. Howell and Prather each acquired 3,0002,000 shares of common stock having a market value of $1.87$1.62 per share on December 31, 201030, 2011 when the restrictions on those shares lapsed.

37


Pension Benefits

Messrs. Howell, Prather, Ryan and Beizer participate in the Pension Plan. The Pension Plan, which is intended to be tax qualified, is available to certain of our employees and the employees of all of our subsidiaries that have been designated as participating companies under the plan.

A participating employee who retires on or after attaining age 65 and who has completed five years of service upon retirement may be eligible to receive during his or her lifetime, in the form of monthly payments, an annual pension equal to (i) 22% of the employee’s average earnings for the highest five consecutive years during the employee’s final ten years of employment multiplied by a factor, the numerator of which is the employee’s years of service credited under the plan before 1994 and the denominator of which is the greater of 25 or the years of service credited under the plan, plus (ii) 0.9% of the employee’s monthly average earnings for the highest five consecutive years in the employee’s final ten years of employment added to 0.6% of monthly average earnings in excess of Social Security covered compensation, multiplied by the employee’s years of service credited under the plan after 1993, with a maximum of 25 years minus years of service credited under (i) above. For participants as of December 31, 1993, there is a minimum benefit equal to the projected benefit under (i) at that time.

In addition, Mr. Ryan would receive retirement benefits paid by Gray under a pension plan with Mr. Ryan’s former employer, Busse Broadcasting Corporation (the “Busse Pension Plan”), which benefit amounts have been frozen since September 1997. The Company acquired Busse Broadcasting Corporation in July 1998 and the Busse Pension Plan was assumed in that transaction.

41


Our NEOs did not receive any pension benefit payments in 2010.2011. The following table shows the years of credited service and the present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 20102011 for the NEOs:

           
  Number   Present
  of Years   Value of
  Credited   Accumulated
  Service(l)   Benefit(2)
Name (#) Plan Name ($)
       
Hilton H. Howell, Jr. 8 Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan 77,591
Robert S. Prather, Jr. 9 Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan 273,822
James C. Ryan 12 Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan 141,998
  9 Busse Pension Plan 54,600
Robert A. Beizer 15 Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan 400,452

Name

  Number
of Years
Credited
Service(1)
(#)
  

Plan Name

  Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit(2)

($)
 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

  9  Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan   131,219  

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

  10  Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan   324,597  

James C. Ryan

  13  Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan   205,782  
  9  Busse Pension Plan   75,040  

Robert A. Beizer

  16  Gray Television, Inc. Retirement Plan   448,322  

(1)Computed as of the same measurement date as used for 20102011 financial statement reporting purposes.
(2)The Present Value of Accumulated Benefit was calculated using the assumptions that were used for 20102011 financial statement reporting purposes, which were the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Tables for the Pension Plan, and the RP 2000 Projected Mortality Table for the Busse Pension Plan, separately for males and females, and a 5.85%4.84% interest discount rate.

38


Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

The NEOs do not have employment agreements or agreements with us that provide severance in the event of a change in control, except to the extent that the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, the Director’sDirectors’ Restricted Stock Plan, the Pension Plan, the Capital Accumulation Plan and the Busse Pension Plan contain such provisions that are applicable to all participants. The information below describes and quantifies certain compensation that would become payable under existing plans, policies and arrangements if the NEO’s employment had terminated (by virtue of involuntary termination, death, disability, voluntary termination or change of control) on December 31, 2010,2011, given the NEO’s compensation and service levels as of such date and, if applicable, based on our closing stock price on that date.December 30, 2011 (the last trading day of 2011). These benefits are in addition to benefits available generally to salaried employees, such as distributions under the Pension Plan, Busse Pension Plan, Capital Accumulation Plan, disability benefits, life insurance and accrued vacation pay.

42


The following table sets forth the amounts that would be owed by Gray to our NEOs as of December 31, 20102011 if they were terminated as a result of involuntary termination, death, disability, voluntary termination or change of control:

                     
  Involuntary         Voluntary Change of
  Termination(l)(2) Death(l)(3) Disability(l)(4) Termination(1)(2) Control(l)(5)
Name ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
                     
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.  92,976   1,059,791   2,828,586   92,976   98,586 
Robert S. Prather, Jr.  328,630   2,197,329   599,728   328,630   334,240 
James C. Ryan  223,521   1,952,522   2,701,521   223,521   223,521 
Robert A. Beizer  26,923   927,649   102,211   26,923   26,923 

Name

  Involuntary
Termination(1)(2)
($)
   Death(1)(3)
($)
   Disability(1)(4)
($)
   Voluntary
Termination(1)(2)
($)
   Change of
Control(1)(5)
($)
 

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   154,296     1,090,307     2,885,916     154,296     155,916  

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   73,077     2,236,996     268,185     73,077     74,697  

James C. Ryan

   313,130     2,010,239     2,791,130     313,130     313,130  

Robert A. Beizer

   26,923     951,584     102,211     26,923     26,923  

(1)Gray does not have a formal severance policy for its NEOs. At the time of a separation from service for any reason, the Board will use its discretion to determine each executive’s severance payment, if any. The amounts reported above reflect any accrued and unpaid benefits payable to the executive officer in addition to payment identified in plan documents and insurance policies.
(2)Includes each NEO’s accrued and unpaid vacation payable upon termination and the present value of accumulated benefits from their pension plan(s) as determined by the plan’s actuary.
(3)Includes each NEO’s accrued and unpaid vacation payable upon termination, the death benefit of their basic and supplemental life insurance coverage, the present value of the accumulated benefits from their pension plan(s) as determined by the plan’s actuary, and accelerated vesting of 100% of their unvested restricted stock awards and stock options. The life insurance benefit reflects the payment of the death benefit by the insurance company for which Gray has been paying premiums on behalf of the NEO.
(4)Includes each NEO’s accrued and unpaid vacation payable upon termination, the amount of long-term disability payments, the present value of accumulated benefits from their pension plan(s) as determined by the plan’s actuary, and accelerated vesting of 100% of their unvested restricted stock awards and stock options. NEOs are entitled to monthly long-term disability payments from the time of disability through age 65.
(5)Includes each NEO’s accrued and unpaid vacation payable upon termination, the present value of accumulated benefits from their pension plan(s) as determined by the plan’s actuary, and accelerated vesting of 100% of their unvested restricted stock awards and stock options.

39


For the purposes of this discussion, “disability” generally means total disability, resulting in the grantee being unable to perform his job, and “change of control” means any of the following: (1) any person becomes the beneficial owner of 45% or more of the combined voting power of our then outstanding shares; (2) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, unless the election of such new directors was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who were directors at the beginning of the period; (3) there is consummated any consolidation or acquisition in which we are not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant to which shares of our common stock are converted into cash, securities or other property; (4) there is consummated any consolidation or acquisition of us, in which we are the continuing corporation, in which the holders of our common stock immediately prior to the acquisition do not own 51% percent or more of the stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the acquisition; (5) there is consummated any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of substantially all our assets; or (6) our shareholders approve any plan or proposal for our liquidation or dissolution.

43


If one of the NEOs were to die or become disabled, or if there were to be a change in control, any unexercisable stock options granted before the date of that event would become exercisable and remain exercisable until the later of one year from the date of death or the expiration date of the grant.

The Director’sDirectors’ Restricted Stock Plan provides that any remaining restrictions on awards of restricted stock generally lapse upon the death or disability of the NEO, and in the event of a change of control, all shares of restricted stock will become immediately and fully transferable, and all periodsbe free of restriction, will expire, and the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan Committee, which administers the Director’sDirectors’ Restricted Stock Plan, will be deemed to waive any forfeiture provisions provided with respect to any award. As of December 31, 2010,2011, the NEOs did not hold any option awards with intrinsic value (that is, their options had an exercise price in excess of our common stock price) that were exercisable or would have become exercisable or vested if the NEO had died or become disabled, or if there had been a change of control, based upon the closing price of our common stock on such date.

the last trading date of 2011.

Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon the events discussed, actual amounts paid or distributed may be different than as disclosed. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event or our stock price.

40


Director Compensation

The current compensation and benefit program for directors is designed to fairly pay directors for time and effort required to be an effective director of a company of our size and scope; to align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of shareholders; and to be simple, transparent and easy for shareholders to understand. Our directors’ compensation for 20102011 included the following compensation elements:

Description

  Amount ($) 
DescriptionAmount ($)

Chairman of the Board’s annual retainer fee

   40,000  

Director’s annual retainer fee

   35,000  

Chairman of the Board fee per board meeting

   4,000  

Director’s fee per board meeting

   3,000  

Audit Committee chairman fee per committee meeting

   4,000  

Audit Committee member fee per committee meeting

   3,500  

Other Committee chairman fee per committee meeting

   3,000  

Other Committee member fee per committee meeting

   3,000  

Directors are generally paid the above fee arrangement for participation in person or by telephone in any meeting of the Board or any committee thereof.

In addition, we adopted the Director’sDirectors’ Restricted Stock Plan in 2003. Pursuant to that plan, we may grant our directors restricted shares of our common stock that vest over five years in equal annual increments. Under the Director’sDirectors’ Restricted Stock Plan, a maximum of 10,000 restricted shares of common stock may be granted to each director in any calendar year. We did not grant any restricted shares to our directors in 2010.

2011.

41

44


Director Compensation in 2010
2011

The table below presents the directors’ compensation for 2010:

                 
      Change in    
      Pension    
      Value and    
  Fees Nonqualified    
  Earned or Deferred    
  Paid in Compensation All Other  
  Cash(2) Earnings(3) Compensation(4) Total
Name(l) ($) ($) ($) ($)
                 
William E. Mayher, III
Chairman of the Board of Directors
  97,000         97,000 
Richard L. Boger  70,000         70,000 
Ray M. Deaver  71,000         71,000 
T. L. Elder  70,000         70,000 
Hilton H. Howell, Jr.  56,000   22,617   7,252   85,869 
ZellB. Miller  71,000         71,000 
Howell W. Newton  72,000         72,000 
Hugh E. Norton  71,000         71,000 
Robert S. Prather, Jr.  56,000   38,815   47,424   142,239 
Harriett J. Robinson  56,000         56,000 
J. Mack Robinson  56,000         56,000 
2011:

Name(1)

  Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash(2)
($)
   Change in
Pension

Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(3)
($)
   All Other
Compensation(4)
($)
   Total
($)
 

William E. Mayher, III
Chairman of the Board of Directors

   79,500     —       —       79,500  

Richard L. Boger

   64,500     —       —       64,500  

Ray M. Deaver

   53,000     —       —       53,000  

T. L. Elder

   64,500     —       —       64,500  

Hilton H. Howell, Jr.

   47,000     53,629     7,252     107,881  

Zell B. Miller

   44,250     —       —       44,250  

Howell W. Newton

   67,000     —       —       67,000  

Hugh E. Norton

   53,000     —       —       53,000  

Robert S. Prather, Jr.

   47,000     50,775     69,928     167,703  

Harriett J. Robinson

   47,000     —       —       47,000  

J. Mack Robinson

   47,000     —       —       47,000  

(1)As of December 31, 2010,2011 and except for Senator Miller, each director owned 3,0001,000 restricted shares of Gray common stock that he or she had received under our Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan.
(2)For all directors, this amount represents cash compensation earned in 20102011 for Board and committee service.
(3)Represents the change in pension value, calculated as the difference between the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 20102011 and the present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2009,2010, adjusted for benefit payments made during the year. The present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2011 was calculated using the assumptions that were used for the December 31, 2011 financial statement disclosures, which were the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table, separately for males and females, and a 4.84% interest discount. The present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2010 was calculated using the assumptions that were used for the December 31, 2010 financial statement disclosures, which were the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table, separately for males and females, and a 5.85% interest discount. The present value of accumulated benefits at December 31, 2009 was calculated using the assumptions that were used for the December 31, 2009 financial statement disclosures, which were the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table, separately for males and females, and a 6.27% interest discount. See the table in the section entitledPension Benefitsherein for additional information, including the present value assumptions used in this calculation.

42

45


(4)Represents all other compensation earned by the named director. For descriptions of the other compensation earned by Mr. Howell and Mr. Prather, refer to the amounts in theAll Other Compensation Table, with the exception of directors’ fees, which are reported separately in thisDirector Compensation in 20102011table.
(5)Retired from the Board effective December 7, 2011.
(6)Mr. Robinson is retiring from the Board at the 2012 Annual Meeting.

The members of our Board are reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses incurred by them during the execution of their duties as members of our Board and any committees. These expenses include but are not limited to mileage, hotel rooms, meals and air transportation.

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMMITTEE

The following Report of the Management Personnel Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by Gray under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent Gray specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

The Management Personnel Committee, acting in its capacity as the Compensation Committee, has reviewed and discussed theCompensation Discussion and Analysiscontained in this proxy statement with management and, based on such review and discussion, the Management Personnel Committee has recommended to the Board that theCompensation Discussion and Analysisbe included herein and in Gray’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

2011.

The Management Personnel Committee has retained Grant Thornton LLP to advise it on current trends and best practices in compensation. The total amount of fees paid by Gray to Grant Thornton for executive compensation services provided as a dedicated compensation advisor to the Management Personnel Committee in 20102011 was approximately $86,709.$66,002. The total amount of fees paid by Gray to Grant Thornton LLP in 20102011 for all other services, excluding Management Personnel Committee services, was approximately $128,657,$135,480, which related to internal audit services. The Management Personnel Committee recommended and approved the provision of these additional services to Gray by Grant Thornton LLP.

Submitted by the Management Personnel Committee of the Board.

Ray M. Deaver, Chairman

William E. Mayher, III
Zell B. Miller

Hugh E. Norton

46


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Messrs. Deaver, Mayher Miller and Norton are the current members of the Management Personnel Committee, which serves as our Compensation Committee. In 2011, prior to his retirement, Mr. Miller also served as a member of the Management Personnel Committee. No member of the Management Personnel Committee was an employee or officer of Gray or any of its subsidiaries during 20102011 or was formerly an officer of Gray or any of its subsidiaries, except that Mr. Deaver served as Gray’s Regional Vice President-Texas from October 1999 until his retirement in December 2001. He was the President and General Manager of KWTX Broadcasting Company and President of Brazos Broadcasting Company from November 1997 until their acquisition by Gray in October 1999. Mr. Robinson had a business relationship with Gray during 2008 as described underCertain Relationships and Related Party Transactions. No compensation committee interlocks existed during 2010.

43

2011.


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
     On December 23, 2008, Gray entered into a one-year consulting contract with Mr. J. Mack Robinson whereby he agreed

The Company was not party to consult and advise Gray with respectany related party transactions required to its television stations and all related mattersbe disclosed in connection with various proposed or existing television stations. In return for his services, Mr. Robinson received compensation under this agreement of $400,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. Prior to Mr. Robinson’s retirement on December 14, 2008, he had served as Gray’s Chief Executive Officer. At all times during which the consulting agreement was in effect, he served as a member of Gray’s Board of Directors and as Chairmanemeritus.

proxy statement.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the directors, executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of a company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership (Form 3) and reports of changes in ownership (Forms 4 and 5) of such class of equity securities. Such officers, directors and greater than ten percent shareholders of a company are required by SEC regulations to furnish the company with copies of all such Section 16(a) reports that they file.

To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports filed with the SEC during the year ended December 31, 2010,2011, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and ten percent beneficial owners were met.

REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE

The following Report of the Audit Committee, together with references in this proxy statement to the independence of the Audit Committee members and the Audit Committee Charter, does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by Gray under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent Gray specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

The Audit Committee of our Board is comprised of four directors who are independent and financially literate in accordance with the NYSE listing standards and the SEC rules regarding audit committees. In addition, the Board has determined that T. L. Elder is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC rules. Our identification of Mr. Elder as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on him any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liabilities imposed on the other members of the audit committee. In accordance with its written charter, which was approved and adopted in its current form by our Board in June 2009, the Audit Committee assists our Board in the oversight of the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices of Gray. In addition, the Audit Committee has the authority to select our independent registered public accounting firm. Gray’s Audit Committee Charter prohibits a member of the Audit Committee from serving on more than three public company audit committees.

47


Management has primary responsibility for Gray’s financial statements and the overall reporting process, including Gray’s system of internal controls. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, audits the annual consolidated financial statements prepared by management and expresses an opinion on whether those statements fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Audit Committee has reviewed our audited

44


consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20102011 and discussed them with both management and McGladrey & Pullen, LLP.

Management is responsible for establishing, assessing and reporting on Gray’s system of internal control over financial reporting. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is responsible for performing an independent audit of Gray’s internal control over financial reporting and to issue a report thereon. The Audit Committee is responsible for the monitoring and oversight of this process. In connection with these responsibilities, the Audit Committee met with management and McGladrey & Pullen, LLP to review and discuss the effectiveness of Gray’s internal controls over financial reporting.

The Audit Committee has also discussed with McGladrey & Pullen, LLP the matters required to be discussed by generally accepted auditing standards, including those described in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended, issued by the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from McGladrey & Pullen, LLP consistent with the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed and confirmed with McGladrey & Pullen, LLP its independence with respect to Gray. In addition, the Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the non-audit services provided by McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is compatible with maintaining that independence.

Based upon this review, the Audit Committee recommended to the full Board that our audited consolidated financial statements be included in Gray’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20102011 and filed with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board.

Howell W. Newton, Chairman

Richard L. Boger

T. L. Elder

William E. Mayher, III

45

48


INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

McGladrey & Pullen, LLP has been our independent registered public accounting firm since May 2006. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP audited our annual financial statements for each of the years ended December 31, 2006 through December 31, 2010.2011. As approved by our Audit Committee, we have appointed McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting for the year ending December 31, 2011.2012. A representative of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is expected to be present at the 20112012 Annual Meeting, and will have the opportunity to make a statement, if he or she desires to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. We have decided to ask our shareholders to ratify the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2011.

2012.

Fees

The fees billed by McGladrey & Pullen, LLP for 20102011 and 20092010 were as follows:

         
  2010 2009
  ($) ($)
Audit fees(l)  823,637   831,381 
Audit-related fees(2)  107,631   99,257 
Tax fees      
All other fees(3)  46,350    
         
         
Total  977,618   930,638 
         

    2011
($)
   2010
($)
 

Audit fees(1)

   800,915     823,637  

Audit-related fees(2)

   108,181     107,631  

Tax fees

   —       —    

All other fees(3)

   30,000     46,350  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   939,096     977,618  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Audit fees include fees for the current year audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, fees for quarterly reviews of our reports on Form 10-Q and consultation concerning accounting issues discussed with the SEC when applicable.
(2)Audit related fees were for audits of our employee benefit plans.
(3)All other fees were for services provided in connection with our issuance of 101/2% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2015.various financing activities.

All audit related services, tax services and other non-audit services must be, and all ofsuch services and the expenses for such services in 20102011 and 20092010 were, pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which also concluded that the provision of such services was compatible with the maintenance of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

In accordance with its written charter, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, on a periodic basis, any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for us by our independent registered public accounting firm.

46

49


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
     The following table gives information about the common stock and Class A common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2010.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
             
          Number of securities remaining
  Number of securities to     available for future issuance
  be issued upon exercise     under equity compensation
  of outstanding options, Weighted average plans (excluding securities
  warrants and rights exercise price of reflected in 1st column)
  (in thousands) outstanding options (in thousands)
Plan Category (#) warrants and rights (#)
             
Common Stock:
            
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(l)(2)  1,005  $7.51   7,394 
             
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders    $     
             
Total  1,005       7,394 
             
             
Class A Common Stock:
            
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(l)    $   1,000 
             
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders    $    
             
Total         1,000 
             
(1)Under our 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, we are authorized to issue new awards of options to acquire up to 4,995,250 shares of either our common stock or our Class A common stock; however, of this amount, we can not grant options to acquire in excess of 1,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock. For purposes of this disclosure, we have assumed the issuance of new awards of options to acquire 3,995,250 shares of our common stock and 1,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock.
(2)Includes 1,629,034 shares of our common stock that are issuable under our Capital Accumulation Plan, which is intended to meet the requirements of Section 401(k) of the IRC, and 770,000 shares of our common stock that are issuable under our Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan.

47


OTHER MATTERS

Our Board knows of no other matters to be brought before the 20112012 Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters are properly brought before the 20112012 Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the named proxies in the accompanying proxy to vote in accordance with their judgment on such matters.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION

IN NEXT YEAR’S PROXY STATEMENT

Proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at our 20122013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received at our principal executive offices by December 21, 2011,20, 2012, in order to be eligible for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy for that meeting.

OTHER SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR PRESENTATION

AT NEXT YEAR’S ANNUAL MEETING

For any proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement, but is instead sought to be presented directly at the 20122013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, management will be able to vote proxies in its discretion if we: (1) receive notice of the proposal before the close of business on March 5, 20122013 and advise shareholders in the 20122013 proxy statement about the nature of the matter and how management intends to vote on such matter; or (2) receive notice of the proposal after the close of business on March 5, 2012.2013. Notices of intention to present proposals at the 20122013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should be addressed to Gray Television, Inc., Attention: Robert A. Beizer, Secretary, 1750 K Street, NW, Suite 1200, Washington, D.C.Kevin Latek, Vice President Law and Development, Gray Television, Inc., 20006.

4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319.

AVAILABILITY OF FORM 10-K

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K is available online atwww.gray.tv in the “SEC Filings” section. We will provide to any shareholder, without charge, upon written request, a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010,2011, as filed with the SEC. Such requests should be addressed to Gray Television, Inc., 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319, Attention: Investor Relations.

HOUSEHOLDING

As permitted under the Exchange Act, to the extent shareholders receive a hard copy of the proxy by mail, only one copy of this proxy statement is being delivered to shareholders residing at the same address, unless such shareholders have notified us of their desire to receive multiple copies of this proxy statement. We will promptly deliver, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of this proxy statement to any shareholder residing at an address to which only one copy was mailed. Requests for additional copies should be directed to Gray Television, Inc., 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319, Attention: Investor Relations.Relations, telephone (404) 266-8333. Shareholders residing at the same address and currently receiving only one copy of the proxy statement may contact Investor Relations at the address above to request multiple copies of the proxy statement in the future. Shareholders residing at the same address and currently receiving multiple copies of the proxy statement may contact Investor Relations at the address above to request that only a single copy of the proxy statement by mailed in the future.

48

50


Appendix A

GRAY TELEVISION, INC.
4370 PEACHTREE ROAD, N.E.
ATLANTA, GA 30319
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use

2007 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Section 1. Establishment and Purpose.

Gray Television, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), hereby establishes this long term incentive plan to be named the InternetGray Television, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for certain Employees and Directors (as such terms are defined below in Section 2) of the Company and its subsidiaries. The purpose of this Plan is to transmit your voting instructionsencourage certain Employees and Directors of the Company, and of such subsidiaries of the Company as the committee administering the Plan designates, to acquire Common Stock of the Company or to receive monetary payments based on the value of such stock or based upon achieving certain goals on a basis mutually advantageous to such Employees and Directors and the Company and thus provide an incentive for continuation of the efforts of Employees and Directors for the success of the Company and for electroniccontinuity of employment and service.

Section 2. Definitions.

Whenever used herein, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below:

(a)Actmeans the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.

(b)Awardmeans any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock, or Performance Award granted under the Plan.

(c)Award Agreementmeans an agreement entered into by the Company and each Participant setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to Awards granted under this Plan.

(d)Base Pricemeans, in the case of an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right, a price fixed by the Committee at which the Option or the Stock Appreciation Right may be exercised which shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of grant of such option or right.

(e)Boardmeans the Board of Directors of the Company.

(f)Change of Controlis defined in Section 14.

(g)Codemeans the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect from time to time.

(h)Committeemeans a committee or subcommittee of the Board that shall administer the Plan, which committee or subcommittee shall consist of no fewer than two members, each of whom shall be a “nonemployee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 (or any successor rule or regulation) promulgated under the Act, and an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m)(4)(C)(i) of the Code.

(i)Covered Employeemeans a Participant who, as of the date of vesting and/or payout of an Award, as applicable, is one of the group of “covered employees,” as defined in the regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the Code, or any successor statute.

(j)Director means any individual who is a member of the Board or board of directors of any member of the Group; provided, however, that any such member who is employed by any member of the Group shall be considered an Employee under this Plan.

A-1


(k) Disabilitymeans permanent and total disability as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code, as determined by the Committee in good faith, upon receipt of and in reliance on sufficient competent medical advice.

(l)Employeemeans an employee (including officers and directors who are also employees) of any member of the Group.

(m)Fair Market Valuemeans, for any particular date, (i) for any period during which the Stock shall not be listed for trading on a national securities exchange, but when prices for the Stock shall be reported by the National Market System of the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (“NASDAQ”), the last transaction price per share as quoted by the National Market System of NASDAQ, (ii) for any period during which the Stock shall not be listed for trading on a national securities exchange or its price reported by the National Market System of NASDAQ, but when prices for the Stock shall be reported by NASDAQ, the closing bid price as reported by the NASDAQ, (iii) for any period during which the Stock shall be listed for trading on a national securities exchange, the closing price per share of stock on such exchange as of the close of such trading day or (iv) the market price per share of Stock as determined by a nationally recognized investment banking firm selected by the Board of Directors determined in accordance with a reasonable valuation method as determined under Code Section 409A and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder in the event neither (i), (ii) or (iii) above shall be applicable. If Market Price is to be determined as of a day when the securities markets are not open, the Market Price on that day shall be the Market Price on the preceding day when the markets were open.

(n)Groupmeans the Company and every Subsidiary of the Company.

(o)Optionmeans the right to purchase Stock at the Base Price for a specified period of time. For purposes of the Plan, an Option may be an “Incentive Stock Option” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, a “Nonqualified Stock Option,” or any other type of stock option encompassed by the Code.

(p)Participantmeans any Employee or Director designated by the Committee to participate in the Plan.

(q)Performance Awardmeans a right to receive a payment equal to the value of a unit or other measure as determined by the Committee based on performance during a Performance Period.

(r)Performance-Based Exceptionmeans the performance-based exception from the tax deductibility limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code.

(s)Performance Periodmeans a period of not more than ten years established by the Committee during which certain performance goals set by the Committee are to be met.

(t)Period of Restrictionmeans the period during which a grant of shares of Restricted Stock is restricted pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan.

(u)Reporting Personmeans a person subject to Section 16 of the Act.

(v)Restricted Stockmeans Stock granted pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan, but a share of such Stock shall cease to be Restricted Stock when the conditions to and limitations on transferability under Section 11 have been satisfied or have expired, respectively.

(w)Retirement(including Normal, Early, and Disability Retirement) means termination of employment with eligibility for normal, early or disability retirement benefits under the terms of the Gray Television, Inc. Pension Plan, as amended and in effect at the time of such termination of employment.

A-2


(x)Stockmeans the authorized and unissued shares of the Company’s class A common stock and common stock or shares of the Company’s class A common stock or common stock held in treasury or previously issued shares of class A common stock or common stock reacquired by the Company, including stock purchased on the open market. The Company’s class A common stock and common stock are substantially similar except for differences in voting rights.

(y)Stock Appreciation RightorSARmeans the right to receive a payment from the Company equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock at the date of exercise over the Base Price. In the case of a Stock Appreciation Right which is granted in conjunction with an Option, the Base Price shall be the Option exercise price.

(z)Subsidiarymeans a subsidiary corporation as defined in Section 425 of the Code.

Section 3. Administration.

The Plan will be administered by the Committee. The determinations of the Committee shall be made in accordance with their judgment as to the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and in accordance with the purpose of the Plan. A majority of members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, and all determinations of the Committee shall be made by a majority of its members. Any determination of the Committee under the Plan may be made without notice or meeting of the Committee, by a writing signed by a majority of the Committee members. Determinations, interpretations, or other actions made or taken by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of the Plan shall be final and binding and conclusive for all purposes and upon all persons whomsoever. The Committee shall have the authority to delegate administrative duties to one or more officers or Employees of the Company or Subsidiaries to the extent that such delegation would not jeopardize the Performance-Based Exception with respect to any Award or otherwise violate applicable law or exchange act rules.

Section 4. Shares Reserved Under the Plan.

There is hereby reserved for issuance under the Plan an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares of Stock with no more than 1,000,000 of the aggregate limit consisting of class A common stock. The above amounts include approximately 2,469,000 shares of Stock that were available for issuance under the 2002 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”), and were transferred to the Plan, added to the reserved Stock and available for issuance to Participants under the Plan. No new Awards shall be made under the 2002 Plan as of the effective date of the Plan. Stock underlying Awards under the 2002 Plan that expire, are cancelled, or are forfeited after the effective date of the Plan may not be added back to the Plan maximum.

Stock underlying outstanding Options or Performance Awards will be counted against the Plan maximum while such Options or Performance Awards are outstanding. Shares underlying expired, canceled or forfeited Awards (except Restricted Stock) may be added back to the Plan maximum. When the exercise price of an Option is paid by delivery of information upshares of Stock, the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan shall continue to be reduced by the gross (rather than the net) number of shares issued pursuant to such exercise, regardless of the number of shares surrendered in payment. The full number of Stock Appreciation Rights granted that are to be settled in Common Stock shall be counted against the number of Shares available for award under the Plan, regardless of the number of Shares actually issued upon settlement of such Stock Appreciation Rights. Restricted Stock issued pursuant to the Plan will be counted against the Plan maximum while outstanding even while subject to restrictions.

Unless and until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the Committee determines that an Award to a Covered Employee shall not be designed to comply with the Performance-Based Exception, the following rules shall apply to grants of such Awards under the Plan:

A-3


(a)Stock Options:The maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be granted in the form of Options, pursuant to any Award granted in any one fiscal year to any one single Participant shall be 500,000 shares.

(b)SARs:The maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be granted in the form of Stock Appreciation Rights, pursuant to any Award granted in any one fiscal year to any one single Participant shall be 500,000 shares.

(c)Performance Awards:The maximum aggregate payout (determined as of the end of the applicable performance period) with respect to Performance Awards granted in any one fiscal year to any one Participant shall be the greater of $1,000,000 or 500,000 shares.

If any Award is cancelled (or is amended in a way that is treated as a cancellation), the shares related to the cancelled Award shall count against the above maximum limitations for the applicable fiscal year.

Section 5. Participants.

Participants will consist of such Employees and Directors of the Company or any designated subsidiary as the Committee in its sole discretion determines have a major impact on the success and future growth and profitability of the Company. Designation of a Participant in any year shall not require the Committee to designate such person to receive an Award in any other year or to receive the same type or amount of Award as granted to the Participant in any other year or as granted to any other Participant in any year. The Committee shall consider such factors as it deems pertinent in selecting Participants and in determining the type and amount of their respective Awards. Only key Employees may be granted Incentive Stock Options under the Plan.

Section 6. Types of Awards.

The following Awards may be granted under the Plan: (a) Incentive Stock Options; (b) Nonqualified Stock Options; (c) Stock Appreciation Rights; (d) Restricted Stock; and (e) Performance Awards; all as described below. Except as specifically limited herein, the Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the type and number of Awards to be granted to any Participant, and the terms and conditions which attach to each Award, which terms and conditions need not be uniform as between different participants. All Awards shall be in writing.

Section 7. Date of Granting Awards.

The date of grant of an Award (the “Award Date”) is the date the Committee makes the Award to a Participant by fixing the material terms of the Award. Promptly after each Award Date, the Company shall notify the Participant of the grant of the Award, and shall hand deliver or mail to the Participant an Award Agreement, duly executed by and on behalf of the Company, with the request that the Participant execute and return the Award Agreement within thirty days after the date of mailing or delivery by the Company of the Award Agreement to the Participant. If the Participant shall fail to execute and return the written Award Agreement within said thirty day beforeperiod, his or her Award shall be automatically terminated, except that if the meeting date. Have your proxy cardParticipant dies within said thirty day period such Award Agreement shall be effective notwithstanding the fact that it has not been signed prior to death.

Section 8. Incentive Stock Options.

Incentive Stock Options shall consist of options to purchase shares of Stock at purchase prices determined by the Committee but not less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock on the date of grant of the Option. Said purchase price may be paid by check or, in handthe discretion of the

A-4


Committee, by the delivery of shares of Stock then owned by the Participant. Incentive Stock Options will be exercisable as provided in the Award Agreement and, except as provided below, will terminate not later than three months after termination of employment for any reason other than death or disability. In the event termination of employment occurs as a result of death or Disability, such an option will be exercisable for 12 months after such termination. If the optionee dies within 12 months after termination of employment by reason of Disability, then the period of exercise following death shall be the remainder of the 12-month period, or three months, whichever is longer. If the optionee dies within three months after termination of employment for any other reason, then the period of exercise following death shall be three months. However, in no event shall any Incentive Stock Option be exercised more than ten years after its grant. Leaves of absence granted by the Company for military service, illness, and transfers of employment between the Company and any subsidiary thereof shall not constitute termination of employment. The aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the time an Option is granted) of the stock with respect to which an Incentive Stock Option is exercisable for the first time during any calendar year (under all option plans of the Company and its subsidiary corporations) shall not exceed $100,000 per participant.

Section 9. Nonqualified Stock Options.

Nonqualified Stock Options shall consist of nonqualified options to purchase shares of Stock at purchase prices determined by the Committee but not less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares of Stock on the date of grant of the Option. The purchase price may be paid by check or, in the discretion of the Committee, by the delivery of shares of Stock then owned by the Participant. The Committee shall determine the vesting and forfeiture provisions of the Nonqualified Stock Options and shall set forth such terms in the Award Agreement. Unless determined otherwise in the Award Agreement, all Options shall terminate three months after termination of employment or service for any reason other than death, Retirement or Disability. Unless determined otherwise in the Award Agreements, in the event termination of employment or service occurs as a result of death, Retirement or Disability, such an Option will terminate 12 months after such termination provided however, if the optionee dies within 12 months after termination of employment or service by Retirement or Disability, then the period of exercise following death shall be three months. In no event shall any Option be exercised more than ten years after its date of grant. Leaves of absence granted to Employees by the Company or leaves of absence taken by Directors for military service, illness, and transfers of employment between the Company and any subsidiary thereof, as applicable, shall not constitute termination of employment or service. The Committee shall have the right to determine at the time the Option is granted whether shares issued upon exercise of a Nonqualified Stock Option shall be subject to other restrictions, and if so, the nature of the restrictions.

Section 10. Stock Appreciation Rights.

Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted which, at the discretion of the Committee, may be exercised (1) in lieu of exercise of an Option, or (2) independent of an Option. If the Option referred to in (1) or (2) above qualified as an Incentive Stock Option pursuant to Section 422 of the Code, the related SAR shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Code and the regulations issued thereunder. The Base Price or grant price of each SAR shall equal the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date of grant of the SAR. At the time of grant, the Committee may establish, in its sole discretion, any other conditions on exercise of an SAR. At the discretion of the Committee, payment for SARs may be made in cash or Stock, or in a combination thereof. The following will apply upon exercise of an SAR:

(a)

Exercise of SARs in Lieu of Exercise of Options. SARs exercisable in lieu of Options may be exercised for all or part of the shares of Stock subject to the related Option upon the exercise of the right to exercise an equivalent number of Options. A SAR may be

A-5


exercised only with respect to the shares of Stock for which its related Option is then exercisable. Upon exercise of a SAR in lieu of exercise of an Option, shares of Stock equal to the number of SARs exercised shall no longer be available for exercise under the related Option (and when a share of Stock is purchased under the related Option, the related SAR shall similarly no longer be available for exercise).

(b)Exercise of SARs Independent of Options. SARs exercisable independent of Options may be exercised upon whatever terms and conditions the Committee, in its sole discretion, imposes upon the SARs.

Section 11. Restricted Stock.

Restricted Stock shall consist of Stock issued or transferred under the Plan (other than upon exercise of Options or as Performance Awards) at any purchase price less than the Fair Market Value thereof on the date of issuance or transfer, or as a bonus. In the case of any Restricted Stock:

(a)The purchase price, if any, will be determined by the Committee.

(b)Restricted Stock may be subject to (i) restrictions on the sale or other disposition thereof; (ii) rights of the Company to reacquire such Restricted Stock at the purchase price, if any, originally paid therefor upon termination of the Employee’s employment or Director’s service within specified periods, (iii) representation by the Employee or Director that he or she intends to acquire Restricted Stock for investment and not for resale, and (iv) such other restrictions, conditions and terms as the Committee deems appropriate.

(c)The Participant shall be entitled to all dividends paid with respect to Restricted Stock during the Period of Restriction and shall not be required to return any such dividends to the Company in the event of the forfeiture of the Restricted Stock.

(d)The Participant shall be entitled to vote the Restricted Stock during the Period of Restriction.

(e)The Committee shall determine whether Restricted Stock is to be delivered to the Participant with an appropriate legend imprinted on the certificate or if the shares are to be deposited in escrow pending removal of the restrictions.

Section 12. Performance Awards.

Performance Awards shall consist of Stock, stock units, cash based units or a combination thereof, to be issued without any payment therefor, in the event that certain performance goals established by the Committee are achieved during the Performance Period. The goals established by the Committee may be based upon company-wide performance or upon operating unit performance or a combination thereof and may include return on average total capital employed, earnings per share, return on shareholders’ equity, market share, growth in Broadcast Cash Flow, growth in Broadcast Cash Flow Less Cash Corporate Expenses, growth in EBITDA, growth in total revenue and/or specified components of total revenue, reduction in or the limitation in the growth of specified operating expenses, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified operating margins, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified weighted average costs of debt, attainment of and/or maintenance of specified weighted costs of capital, operating income (loss), income (loss) from continuing operations, pretax income from continuing operations, and, for a Performance Award that the Committee determines shall not be designed to comply with the Performance Based Exception, such other goals as may be established by the Committee. Unless and until the Committee determines that a Performance Award to a Covered Employee shall not be

A-6


designed to comply with the Performance-Based Exception, any performance goal related to a Performance Award must be established in writing by the Committee at a time when you access the web siteoutcome of the performance goal is substantially uncertain and follownot later than the instructionsearlier of (1) 90 days after the commencement of the period of service to obtain your recordswhich the performance goal relates or (2) 25 percent of the period of service to which the performance goal relates has elapsed. In the event the minimum corporate goal is not achieved at the conclusion of the Performance Period, no payment shall be made to the Participant. Actual payment of the Performance Award earned shall be a single sum and in cash or in Stock or in a combination of both, as the Committee in its sole discretion determines. If Stock is used, the Participant shall not have the right to vote and receive dividends until the goals are achieved and the actual shares are issued. In the event a Performance Award of stock units is paid in cash instead of Stock, the number of shares reserved for issuance hereunder and the number of shares which may be granted in the form of Performance Awards shall be reduced as if shares had been issued.The Committee shall certify in writing that any performance goals and any other material terms of a Performance Award have been achieved prior to the actual payment of the Performance Award. All Performance Awards shall be paid in full to the Participant no later than the 15th day of the third month following the end of the first calendar year in which the Performance Period ends or such Awards are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

Section 13. Adjustment Provisions.

In the event of any change in corporate capitalization, such as a stock split, stock dividend or reclassification, or a corporate transaction, such as any merger, consolidation, separation, including a spin-off, or other distribution of stock or property of the Company, any reorganization (whether or not such reorganization comes within the definition of such term in Code Section 368) or any partial or complete liquidation of the Company, such adjustment shall be made in the number and class of Stock which may be delivered under Section 4, in the number and class of and/or price of Shares subject to outstanding Awards granted under the Plan, and in the Award limits set forth in Section 4 as may be determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee, in its sole discretion, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights; provided, however, that the number of shares of Stock subject to any Award shall always be a whole number. The Committee shall not make any adjustment pursuant to this Section 13 that would cause an Award that is otherwise exempt from Code Section 409A to become subject to Section 409A; or that would cause an Award that is subject to Code Section 409A to fail to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 409A.

Section 14. Change of Control.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, upon a Change of Control, the Committee may make such adjustments with respect to Awards and take such other action as it deems advisable, including, without limitation, the substitution of new Awards, or the adjustment of outstanding Awards, or the termination of outstanding Awards, the acceleration of Awards, the removal of restrictions on outstanding Awards, or the termination of outstanding Awards in exchange for the cash value determined in good faith by the Committee of the vested and/or unvested portion of the Award. Any adjustment pursuant to this Section 14 may provide, in the Committee’s discretion, for the elimination without payment therefore of any fractional shares that might otherwise become subject to any Award, but except as set forth in this Section 14 may not otherwise diminish the then value of the Award. The foregoing adjustment and the manner of application of the foregoing provisions shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion and to createthe extent permitted under Section 409A of the Code and the regulations thereunder.

For purposes of this Plan, a “Change of Control” shall occur if (i) any Person (other than the Company or a Permitted Holder) is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under

A-7


the Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company which represent forty-five percent (45%) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; (ii) during any period of two (2) consecutive years individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, unless the election, or the nomination for election, by the Company’s shareholders, of each new director is approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who were directors at the beginning of the period but excluding any individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of either an electronicactual or threatened election contest (as such term is used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A promulgated under the Act) or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a person other than the Board; (iii) there is consummated any consolidation or merger of the Company in which the Company is not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant to which shares of the Company’s Stock are converted into cash, securities, or other property, other than a merger of the Company in which the holders of the Company’s Stock immediately prior to the merger have the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger; (iv) there is consummated any consolidation or merger of the Company in which the Company is the continuing or surviving corporation in which the holders of the Company’s Stock immediately prior to the merger do not own fifty-one percent (51%) or more of the combined voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would likepower of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger; (v) there is consummated any sale, lease, exchange, or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company, or (vi) the shareholders of the Company approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company. For purposes of the above definition, a “Permitted Holder” means (i) each of J. Mack Robinson and Robert S. Prather, Jr.; (ii) their spouses and lineal descendants; (iii) in the event of the incompetence or death or any of the Persons described in clauses (i) and (ii), such Person’s estate, executor, administrator, committee and other personal representative; (iv) any trusts created for the benefit of the Persons described in clause (i) or (ii); (v) any person controlled by any of the Persons described in clause (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv); or (vi) any group of Persons (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) in which the Persons described in clauses (i) — (v), individually or collectively, control such group. For purposes of this definition, “control,” as used with respect to any Person, shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such Person, whether through ownership of voting securities or by agreement or otherwise.

Section 15. Nontransferability.

Each Award granted under the Plan to a Participant shall not be transferable otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and shall be exercisable, during the Participant’s lifetime, only by the Participant. In the event of the death of a Participant, exercise of payment shall be made only:

(a)By or to the executor or administrator of the estate of the deceased Participant or the person or persons to whom the deceased Participant’s rights under the Award shall pass by will or the laws of descent and distribution; and

(b)To the extent that the deceased Participant was entitled thereto at the date of his death, provided, however, that any otherwise applicable six-month holding period shall not be required for exercise by or payment to an executor or administrator of the estate of a deceased Reporting Person.

Section 16. Withholding.

The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy Federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign,

A-8


required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of this Plan.

With respect to withholding required upon the exercise of Options or SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, or upon any other taxable event arising as a result of Awards granted hereunder, Participants may elect, subject to the approval of the Committee, to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the minimum statutory total tax which could be imposed on the transaction. All such elections shall be irrevocable, made in writing, signed by the Participant, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.

Section 17. No Right to Employment or Service

A Participant’s right, if any, to continue to serve the Company and its subsidiaries as an Employee or Director or otherwise, shall not be enlarged or otherwise affected by his or her designation as a Participant under the Plan.

Section 18. Amendment of the Plan

The Board of Directors may amend the Plan from time to time or terminate the Plan at any time. However, no action authorized by this paragraph shall reduce the amount of any existing Award or change the terms and conditions thereof without the Participant’s consent except as specifically provided herein under Sections 13 and 14 or as otherwise required by law. Except for adjustments in accordance with Section 13, no amendment of the Plan or other similar actions, shall, without approval of the shareholders of the Company (a) increase the total number of shares which may be issued under the Plan or increase the amount of type of Awards that may be granted under the Plan; (b) change the minimum purchase price, if any, of shares of Stock which may be made subject to Awards under the Plan; or (c) modify the requirements as to eligibility for Awards under the Plan. No Award shall be granted more than ten years after the effective date of the Plan. Except in connection with a corporate transaction or event described in Section 13 of this Plan, the terms of outstanding Awards may not be amended to reduce the costs incurredBase Price, or cancel outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights in exchange for cash, other Awards or Options or Stock Appreciation Rights with a Base Price that is less than the Base Price of the original Options or Base Price of the original Stock Appreciation Rights, as applicable, without shareholder approval. The foregoing sentence is intended to prohibit the repricing of “underwater” Options and Stock Appreciation Rights and will not be construed to prohibit the adjustments provided for in Section 13 of this Plan.

Section 19. Securities Requirements

With respect to insiders, transactions under this Plan are intended to comply with all applicable conditions or Rule 16b-3 or its successors under the 1934 Act. To the extent any provision of the plan or action by Gray Television, Inc.the Board or Committee fails to so comply, it shall be deemed null and void, to the extent permitted by law and deemed advisable by the Board or Committee.

The Committee may suspend the exercise or payment of any Award so long as it determines that securities exchange listing or registration or qualification under any securities laws is required in mailing proxy materials, you can consentconnection therewith and has not been completed on terms acceptable to receivingthe Committee.

A-9


Section 20. Effective Date of Plan and Shareholder Approval.

The Plan shall be effective on May 2, 2007, provided the approval of the shareholders of the Company is obtained. If the shareholders do not approve the Plan, the Plan shall not go into effect and no Awards shall be made under the Plan.

Section 21. Governing Law.

Except to the extent preempted by any applicable federal law, the Plan will be construed and administered in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia, without reference to the principles of conflicts of law. All Incentive Stock Options to be granted hereunder are intended to comply with Code Section 422, and all future proxy statements, proxy cardsprovisions of the Plan and annual reports electronically via e-mailall Incentive Stock Options granted hereunder must be construed in such manner as to effectuate that intent. All Awards to be granted hereunder are intended to comply with the exemptions or deferred compensation requirements of Code Section 409A, and all provisions of the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions abovePlan and all Awards granted hereunder must be construed in such a manner as to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicateeffectuate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.


intent.

A-10


GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

4370 PEACHTREE ROAD, N.E.

ATLANTA, GA 30319

  

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Gray Television, Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:  
  M34876-P09990M46302-P23548-Z57378   KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
  
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — —

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

GRAY TELEVISION, INC.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:


For
All
Withhold
All
For All
Except
To withhold authority to vote for any individual
nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the
number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
   1.      Election of Directors  ooo
                   
 
Nominees 
 
01) Richard L. Boger 07) Howell W. Newton     
02) Ray M. Deaver 08) Hugh E. Norton      
03) T. L. Elder 09) Robert S. Prather, Jr.      
04) Hilton H. Howell, Jr. 10) Harriett J. Robinson      
05) William E. Mayher, III 11) J. Mack Robinson      
06) Zell B. Miller        
 
                    
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: 
 For Against Abstain  The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:  For Against Abstain
 
2. To approve, by non-binding vote, executive compensation. o o o  4. To ratify the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2011. o o o
 
The Board of Directors recommends you vote 3 YEARS on the following proposal:
1 Year2 Years3 YearsAbstain
3.To recommend, by non-binding vote, the frequency of executive compensation votes.ooooNOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
For address change/comments, mark here.
(see reverse for instructions)
o
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date


 

GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

 

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

    

For

All

 

    Withhold

    All

     For All

    Except

   To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.         

1.        Election of Directors

   ¨ 

¨

 

 ¨

 

            
   

Nominees

 

                      
   01)  Richard L. Boger 06) William E. Mayher, III             
   02)  Ray M. Deaver 07) Howell W. Newton             
   03)  T. L. Elder 08) Hugh E. Norton             
   04)  Hilton H. Howell, Jr. 09) Robert S. Prather, Jr.             
   05)  Robin R. Howell 10) Harriett J. Robinson             
  
  

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3:

 

 For  Against  Abstain   
  2.        To approve amendments to the Gray Television, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan. ¨  ¨  ¨   
  
  3.        To ratify the appointment of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2012. ¨  ¨  ¨   
  
  NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.        
  
  

For address change/comments, mark here.

(see reverse for instructions)

 

  

 

¨

 

               
  
  

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

        
          
              
                                   

  Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

 

 

Date

 

        

Signature (Joint Owners)

 

 Date         


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
Shareholder Meeting To Be

Held on May 30, 2012:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com.

www.proxyvote.com.

— — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — —

M46303-P23548-Z57378

M34877-P09990       

PROXY

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

OF DIRECTORS

GRAY TELEVISION, INC.

The undersigned hereby appoints William E. Mayher, III and Hilton H. Howell, Jr. and each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as provided on the other side of this ballot, all of the shares of common stock and Class A common stock of Gray Television, Inc. that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of ShareownersShareholders of Gray Television, Inc. to be held June 1, 2011,May 30, 2012, at The Peachtree Insurance Center, The Executive Board Room, 5th Floor, 4370 Peachtree Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30319 and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE BUT THE CARD IS SIGNED, THIS PROXY CARD WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES UNDER PROPOSAL 1, FOR PROPOSAL 2 FOR 3 YEARSAND FOR PROPOSAL 3 AND FOR PROPOSAL 4, AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES WITH RESPECT TO SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING.

Address change/comments:

Address change/comments:

(If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

Continued and to be signed on reverse side